Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34716311›Full record

ReviewCell death discovery2021

Targeting CK2 in cancer: a valuable strategy or a waste of time?

Mauro Salvi, Christian Borgo, Lorenzo A Pinna, Maria Ruzzene

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell death discovery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. CK2 Chemical Probes: Past, Present, and Future.Kinases and phosphatases · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mauro SalviDeptartment Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3448-6048
Christian BorgoDeptartment Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9540-8145
Lorenzo A PinnaDeptartment Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy. lorenzo.pinna@unipd.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8856-4956
Maria RuzzeneDeptartment Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy. maria.ruzzene@unipd.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8712-8151
University of Padua · IT

Funding

AFM-Téléthon (French Muscular Dystrophy Association) 22974Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (Italian Association for Cancer Research) IG 18756Fondazione per la Ricerca sulla Fibrosi Cistica (Fondazione FFC) FFC#11/2019Fondazione per la Ricerca sulla Fibrosi Cistica (Fondazione FFC) FFC#12/2017Università degli Studi di Padova (University of Padova) BORG_BIRD2121_01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CK2 is a protein kinase involved in several human diseases (ranging from neurological and cardiovascular diseases to autoimmune disorders, diabetes, and infections, including COVID-19), but its best-known implications are in cancer, where it is considered a pharmacological target. Several CK2 inhibitors are available and clinical trials are underway in different cancer types. Recently, the suitability of CK2 as a broad anticancer target has been questioned by the finding that a newly developed compound, named SGC-CK2-1, which is more selective than any other known CK2 inhibitor, is poorly effective in reducing cell growth in different cancer lines, prompting the conclusion that the anticancer efficacy of CX-4945, the commonly used clinical-grade CK2 inhibitor, is to be attributed to its off-target effects. Here we perform a detailed scrutiny of published studies on CK2 targeting and a more in-depth analysis of the available data on SGC-CK2-1 vs. CX-4945 efficacy, providing a different perspective about the actual reliance of cancer cells on CK2. Collectively taken, our arguments would indicate that the pretended dispensability of CK2 in cancer is far from having been proved and warn against premature conclusions, which could discourage ongoing investigations on a potentially valuable drug target.

Identifiers

PMID34716311
PMCPMC8555718
OpenAlexW3210674384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.