Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34716270›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Live agent preference and social action monitoring in the macaque mid-superior temporal sulcus region.

Taihei Ninomiya, Atsushi Noritake, Masaki Isoda

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Translating functional brain activity between humans and monkeys.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Primate neuroethology: a new synthesis.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Understanding the Brain as a Mentalizing Machine with a Symbol Grounding Function.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  6. Differential and Temporally Dynamic Involvement of Primate Amygdala Nuclei in Face Reality and Reward Information Processing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Dynamic spatial representation of self and others' actions in the macaque frontal cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Tuning in to real-time social interactions in macaques.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Taihei NinomiyaDivision of Behavioral Development, Department of System Neuroscience, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, National Institutes of Natural Sciences, Okazaki 444-8585, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6098-9637
Atsushi NoritakeDivision of Behavioral Development, Department of System Neuroscience, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, National Institutes of Natural Sciences, Okazaki 444-8585, Japan.
Masaki IsodaDivision of Behavioral Development, Department of System Neuroscience, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, National Institutes of Natural Sciences, Okazaki 444-8585, Japan; isodam@nips.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-5094-6254
National Institutes of Natural Sciences · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mentalizing, the ability to infer the mental states of others, is a cornerstone of adaptive social intelligence. While functional brain mapping of human mentalizing has progressed considerably, its evolutionary signature in nonhuman primates remains debated. The discovery that the middle part of the macaque superior temporal sulcus (mid-STS) region has a connectional fingerprint most similar to the human temporoparietal junction (TPJ)-a crucial node in the mentalizing network-raises the possibility that these cortical areas may also share basic functional properties associated with mentalizing. Here, we show that this is the case in aspects of a preference for live social interactions and in a theoretical framework of predictive coding. Macaque monkeys were trained to perform a turn-taking choice task with another real monkey partner sitting directly face-to-face or a filmed partner appearing in prerecorded videos. We found that about three-fourths of task-related mid-STS neurons exhibited agent-dependent activity, most responding selectively or preferentially to the partner's action. At the population level, activities of these partner-type neurons were significantly greater under live-partner compared to video-recorded-partner task conditions. Furthermore, a subset of the partner-type neurons responded proactively when predictions about the partner's action were violated. This prediction error coding was specific to the action domain; almost none of the neurons signaled error in the prediction of reward. The present findings highlight unique roles of the macaque mid-STS at the single-neuron level and further delineate its functional parallels with the human TPJ in social cognitive processes associated with mentalizing.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainBrain MappingMacacaMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMentalizationNeural PathwaysSocial CognitionSocial InteractionSocial PerceptionTemporal LobeTheory of Mindaction prediction errormentalizingother-actionself-actiontemporoparietal junction

Identifiers

PMID34716270
PMCPMC8612246
OpenAlexW3209175273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.