Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34716169›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Defining collective capability in Australian evaluations that are conducted by, for and with Indigenous peoples for health programmes, policies and services: a concept analysis protocol.

Bobby Lee Maher, Jillian Guthrie, Elizabeth Ann Sturgiss, Margaret Cargo, Raymond Lovett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Culturally Informed Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Evaluations: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bobby Lee MaherNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Acton, Australian Capital Territory, Australia bobby.maher@anu.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-7079-3179
Jillian GuthrieNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Acton, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5031-0910
Elizabeth Ann SturgissNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Acton, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4428-4060
Margaret CargoHealth Research Institute, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6466-7627
Raymond LovettNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Acton, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8905-2135

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIndigenist evaluation is emergent in Australia; the premise of which is that evaluations are undertaken for Indigenous, by Indigenous and with Indigenous people. This provides opportunities to develop new models and approaches. Exploring a collective capability approach could be one way to inform an Indigenist evaluation methodology. Collective capability suggests that a base of skills and knowledges exist, and when these assets come together, empowerment and agency emerge. However, collective capability requires defining as it is not common terminology in population health or evaluation. Our aim is to define the concept of collective capability in Indigenist evaluation in Australia from an Australian Indigenous standpoint. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A modified Rodgers' evolutionary concept analysis will be used to define collective capability in an Australian Indigenous evaluation context, and to systematically review and synthesise the literature. Approximately 20 qualitative interviews with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander knowledge holders will clarify the meaning of collective capability and inform appropriate search strategy terms with a consensus process then used to code the literature. We will then systematically collate, synthesise and analyse the literature to identify exemplars or models of collective capability from the literature. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol has approval from the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies Ethics Committee, approval no. EO239-20210114. All knowledge holders will provide written consent to participate in the research. This protocol provides a process to developing a concept, and will form the basis of a new framework and assessment tool for Indigenist evaluation practice. The concept analysis will establish definitions, characteristics and attributes of collective capability. Findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal, conference presentations, the project advisory group, the Thiitu Tharrmay reference group and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community partners supporting the project.

Indexed as

Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesHealth PolicyHealth Services, IndigenousAustraliaHumansSystematic Reviews as Topichealth policyorganisational developmentpublic healthqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID34716169
PMCPMC8559119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.