Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34716155›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

COVID-19 seroprevalence among hospital staff and preprocedural patients in Thai community hospitals: a cross-sectional study.

Tanawin Nopsopon, Krit Pongpirul, Korn Chotirosniramit, Narin Hiransuthikul

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin antibodies in Wuhan, China: part of the city-wide massive testing campaign.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tanawin NopsoponDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Chulalongkorn University Faculty of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-0428-973X
Krit PongpirulDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Chulalongkorn University Faculty of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand doctorkrit@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3818-9761
Korn ChotirosniramitDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Chulalongkorn University Faculty of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand.
Narin HiransuthikulDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Chulalongkorn University Faculty of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-1517-7445
Chulalongkorn University · THHarvard University · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe aimed to explore the seroprevalence of hospital staff comparing to preprocedural patients in Thai community hospitals to shed light on the situation of COVID-19 infection of frontline healthcare workers in low infection rate countries where mass screening was not readily available.

designCross-sectional study.

setting52 community hospitals in 35 provinces covered all regions of Thailand.

participants857 participants consisted of 675 hospital staff and 182 preprocedural patients. OUTCOME MEASURE: COVID-19 seroprevalence using a locally developed rapid IgM/IgG test kit

resultsOverall, 5.5% of the participants (47 of 857) had positive IgM, 0.2% (2 of 857) had positive IgG which both of them also had positive IgM. Hospitals located in the central part of Thailand had the highest IgM seroprevalence (11.9%). Preprocedural patients had a higher rate of positive IgM than the hospital staff (12.1% vs 3.7%). Participants with present upper respiratory tract symptoms had a higher rate of positive IgM than those without (9.6% vs 4.5%). Three quarters (80.5%, 690 of 857) of the participants were asymptomatic, of which, 31 had positive IgM (4.5%) which consisted of 20 of 566 healthcare workers (3.5%) and 11 of 124 preprocedural patients (8.9%).

conclusionsCOVID-19 antibody test could detect a substantial number of potential silent spreaders in Thai community hospitals where the nasopharyngeal PCR was not readily available, and the antigen test was prohibited. Antibody testing should be encouraged for mass screening in a limited resource setting, especially in asymptomatic individuals.

trial registrationTCTR20200426002.

Indexed as

COVID-19Antibodies, ViralCross-Sectional StudiesHealth PersonnelHospitals, CommunityHumansImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MPersonnel, HospitalSARS-CoV-2Seroepidemiologic StudiesThailandAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MCOVID-19hospitalsSARS-CoV-2seroepidemiologic studiesThailand

Identifiers

PMID34716155
PMCPMC8559109
OpenAlexW3209554838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.