Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34715921›Full record

ArticleExperimental hematology & oncology2021

Red blood cells differentiated in vitro using sequential liquid and semi-solid culture as a pre-clinical model.

Matthew Cannon, Hannah Phillips, Sidney Smith, Shaneice Mitchell, Kristina Landes, Payal Desai, John Byrd, Rosa Lapalombella

Open access · goldAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental hematology & oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew CannonDivision of Hematology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Hannah PhillipsDivision of Hematology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Sidney SmithDivision of Hematology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Shaneice MitchellDivision of Hematology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Kristina LandesDivision of Hematology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Payal DesaiDivision of Hematology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
John ByrdDivision of Hematology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Rosa LapalombellaDivision of Hematology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. Rosa.Lapalombella@osumc.edu.
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

T32 Training Program in Mechanisms and Innovation in Vascular DiseaseT32HL098049 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Nicholas James Leeper, Philip S Tsao · 2010 to 2026
$6.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL098049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The in vitro erythrocyte differentiation model remains a strong, clinically relevant tool to model erythroid development in normal and disease related hematopoiesis. This model also has application to developing therapeutics for diseases related to red blood cells such as sickle cell anemia where targeting increased expression of fetal hemoglobin has been a major emphasis. Since the original protocol's publication in 2002, many groups have published modified methodologies to address issues in efficiency of maturation and terminal enucleation, as well as in scalability. While all reports have merit and show efficient enucleation, the methodologies used vary widely in technique and cytokine content. Additionally, despite the strengths in these methods, reproducibility of efficient differentiation to the point of differentiation is difficult. To address these limitations, we developed a streamlined process where total PBMCs are first primed using the original liquid culture expansion phase (published in 2002) before being differentiated with minimal input via standardized, commercially purchased semi-solid medium culture pre-supplemented with erythropoietin. Our data show this methodology to produce similar levels of CD235/CD71 positivity as previous methods but with enhanced CD235 solo positivity and evidence of enucleated cells in comparison with other widely used methods. Given the difficulty and wide variation in in vitro differentiation techniques, we present this methodology as a streamlined methodology for production of mature erythroid cells with minimal input using easily purchased reagents.

Identifiers

PMID34715921
PMCPMC8555309
OpenAlexW3210127252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.