Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34715836›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2021

Bitter and sweet taste perception: relationships to self-reported oral hygiene habits and oral health status in a survey of Australian adults.

Kiranjit Kaur, Dean Sculley, Martin Veysey, Mark Lucock, Janet Wallace, Emma L Beckett

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Longitudinal assessment and predictors of subjective taste change after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT).Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Variations in basic taste perception and body mass index.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2025
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Extragustatory bitter taste receptors in head and neck health and disease.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kiranjit KaurSchool of Environmental and Life Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, NSW, Australia.
Dean SculleySchool of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, The University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, NSW, Australia.
Martin VeyseySchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, NSW, Australia.
Mark LucockSchool of Environmental and Life Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, NSW, Australia.
Janet WallaceSchool of Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, NSW, Australia.
Emma L BeckettSchool of Environmental and Life Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, NSW, Australia. emma.beckett@newcastle.edu.au.
Hunter Water · AUHunter Medical Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOral health, an essential part of general health and well-being, is influenced by multiple factors, including oral hygiene habits and dietary factors. Dietary preferences are influenced by variation in taste perceptions and threshold tasting. Polymorphisms in specific genes for sweet and bitter taste receptors and bitter taste perception have been associated with dental caries. However, taste is complex with multiple receptors, each with multiple potential polymorphisms contributing to taste perception as well as social, cultural, and environmental influences. Additionally, these association studies have been conducted in restricted cohorts (e.g., children only). Furthermore, outcomes have been limited to dental caries and studies between taste perception and oral hygiene habits have not been completed.

methodsA cross-sectional online survey was conducted to investigate the relationships between bitter and sweet taste perception (liking and intensity of index food items), self-reported oral hygiene habits and oral health (n = 518).

resultsHigher mean intensity scores for bitter (16-21%) and sweet (< 5%-60%) were seen with higher frequencies of oral hygiene habits (brushing, use of mouthwash, chewing gum and tongue cleaning). Lower mean bitter liking scores (18-21%) were seen with higher frequencies of oral hygiene habits (brushing, mouthwash use, floss use and chewing gum). Sweet liking scores varied by reported frequency of mouthwash use and flossing only, with mixed patterns of variance. Mean bitter and sweet intensity perception scores varied with the number of dental caries ((13-20% higher in those with 3 or more caries, compared to none).

conclusionsWhile there were numerous relationships identified between liking and perception of sweet and bitter and oral health outcomes, the magnitude and direction of associations varied by outcome. The direction of the associations cannot be inferred due to the cross-sectional nature of the study. The demonstrated relationships justify further future investigations, which could help better understand if taste liking and perception is impacted by oral hygiene and health, or vice versa. This could be important in understanding the causation and progression of oral health diseases or the development of novel therapeutics for oral health.

Indexed as

Dental CariesTaste PerceptionAdultAustraliaChildCross-Sectional StudiesFood PreferencesHabitsHumansOral HealthOral HygieneSelf ReportTasteBitterIntensityLikingOral healthOral hygienePerceptionSweetTaste

Identifiers

PMID34715836
PMCPMC8555166
OpenAlexW3209507333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.