ArticleBMC bioinformatics2021
Centrality of drug targets in protein networks.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- ARKbase: Antimicrobial Resistance Knowledgebase1.0.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Trends and challenges in imaging research of Parkinson's disease: a 10-year bibliometric analysis.Psychoradiology · 2026Article
- Node properties of biomarkers within the protein-protein interaction network derived from breast cancer-associated genes.PloS one · 2026Article
- Network analysis of antimicrobial resistance inNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Discovering anticancer drug target combinations via network-informed signaling-based approach.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- The Omics-Driven Machine Learning Path to Cost-Effective Precision Medicine in Chronic Kidney Disease.Proteomics · 2025Review
- PGxDB: an interactive web-platform for pharmacogenomics research.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Anticancer Target Combinations: Network-Informed Signaling-Based Approach to Discovery.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Dynamics-based protein network features accurately discriminate neutral and rheostat positions.Biophysical journal · 2024Article
- Signature reversion of three disease-associated gene signatures prioritizes cancer drug repurposing candidates.FEBS open bio · 2024Article
- MicroRNAs in the Pathogenesis of Preeclampsia-A Case-Control In Silico Analysis.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Article
- PINNED: identifying characteristics of druggable human proteins using an interpretable neural network.Journal of cheminformatics · 2023Article
- Targeting stressor-induced dysfunctions in protein-protein interaction networks via epichaperomes.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2023Review
- Machine learning hypothesis-generation for patient stratification and target discovery in rare disease: our experience with Open Science in ALS.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2023Article
- Mapping the cell-membrane proteome of the SKBR3/HER2+ cell line to the cancer hallmarks.PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the pharmaceutical industry, competing for few validated drug targets there is a drive to identify new ways of therapeutic intervention. Here, we attempted to define guidelines to evaluate a target's 'fitness' based on its node characteristics within annotated protein functional networks to complement contingent therapeutic hypotheses.
resultsWe observed that targets of approved, selective small molecule drugs exhibit high node centrality within protein networks relative to a broader set of investigational targets spanning various development stages. Targets of approved drugs also exhibit higher centrality than other proteins within their respective functional class. These findings expand on previous reports of drug targets' network centrality by suggesting some centrality metrics such as low topological coefficient as inherent characteristics of a 'good' target, relative to other exploratory targets and regardless of its functional class. These centrality metrics could thus be indicators of an individual protein's 'fitness' as potential drug target. Correlations between protein nodes' network centrality and number of associated publications underscored the possibility of knowledge bias as an inherent limitation to such predictions.
conclusionsDespite some entanglement with knowledge bias, like structure-oriented 'druggability' assessments of new protein targets, centrality metrics could assist early pharmaceutical discovery teams in evaluating potential targets with limited experimental proof of concept and help allocate resources for an effective drug discovery pipeline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.