Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34715783›Full record

ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2021

The 10-year incidence of hypertension across blood pressure categories in a population-based cohort in southwestern Sweden.

Ulf Lindblad, Klara Lundholm, Jenny Eckner, Ying Li, Lennart Råstam, I Margareta Hellgren, Bledar Daka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ulf LindbladSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine/Primary Care, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, PO Box 454, 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden. ulf.lindblad@allmed.gu.se.ORCID 0000-0001-6197-3269
Klara LundholmSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine/Primary Care, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, PO Box 454, 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jenny EcknerDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Ying LiSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine/Primary Care, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, PO Box 454, 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Lennart RåstamDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
I Margareta HellgrenSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine/Primary Care, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, PO Box 454, 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Bledar DakaSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine/Primary Care, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, PO Box 454, 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
University of Gothenburg · SELund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo explore the determinants of incident hypertension, and especially the impact of baseline blood pressure categories, in a representative Swedish population.

methodsA 10-year longitudinal study of residents aged 30-74. Blood pressures were measured and categorized according to ESH guidelines with optimal blood pressure < 120/80 mmHg, normal 120-129/80-84 mmHg, and high normal 130-139/85-89 mmHg. Incident hypertension was defined as ongoing treatment or three consecutive blood pressure readings ≥ 140/ ≥ 90 mmHg (one or both) at follow-up, while those with ≥ 140 and/or ≥ 90 mmHg at only one or two visits were labelled as unstable. After excluding subjects with hypertension, ongoing blood pressure lowering medication or a previous CVD event at baseline, 1099 remained for further analyses.

resultsSixteen (2.6%) subjects with optimal baseline blood pressure had hypertension at follow up. Corresponding numbers for subjects with normal, high normal and unstable blood pressure were 55 (19.4%), 50 (39.1%) and 46 (74.2%), respectively. Compared with subjects in optimal group those in normal, high normal and unstable blood pressure categories had significantly higher risk to develop manifest hypertension with odds ratios OR and (95% CI) of 7.04 (3.89-12.7), 17.1 (8.88-33.0) and 84.2 (37.4-190), respectively, with adjustment for age, BMI and family history for hypertension. The progression to hypertension was also independently predicted by BMI (p < 0.001), however, not by age.

conclusionsSubjects with high normal or unstable blood pressure should be identified in clinical practice, evaluated for global hypertension risk and offered personalized advice on lifestyle modification for early prevention of manifest hypertension and cardiovascular disease.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBlood PressureExerciseFemaleHumansHypertensionIncidenceLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPrehypertensionRisk FactorsSwedenCohort studyHigh normal blood pressureIncident hypertensionPopulation surveyPrehypertension

Identifiers

PMID34715783
PMCPMC8556935
OpenAlexW3209202971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.