Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34715452›Full record

ArticleOral oncology2021

Surgical factors associated with patient-reported quality of life outcomes after free flap reconstruction of the oral cavity.

Joaquin E Jimenez, Marci Lee Nilsen, William E Gooding, Jennifer L Anderson, Nayel I Khan, Leila J Mady, Tamara Wasserman-Wincko, Umamaheswar Duvvuri, Seungwon Kim, Robert L Ferris and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oral oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Quality of Life After Head and Neck Cancer Surgery and Free Flap Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Joaquin E JimenezDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, United States.
Marci Lee NilsenDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, United States; University of Pittsburgh, School of Nursing, Department of Acute and Tertiary Care, United States.
William E GoodingBiostatistics Facility, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, United States.
Jennifer L AndersonDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, United States.
Nayel I KhanDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, United States.
Leila J MadyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, United States; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, United States.
Tamara Wasserman-WinckoDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, United States.
Umamaheswar DuvvuriDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, United States.
Seungwon KimDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, United States.
Robert L FerrisDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, United States; UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, United States.
Mario G SolariDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, United States; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, United States.
Mark W KubikDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, United States; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, United States.
Jonas T JohnsonDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, United States.
Shaum SridharanDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, United States; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, United States. Electronic address: sridharans2@upmc.edu.
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USUPMC Hillman Cancer Center · USCalifornia University of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

VECTOR CORE FACILITYP30CA047904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Leonard J. Appleman · 1988 to 2026
$158.0M
WILD TYPE P53-BASED ADJUVANT IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR SCCHNP50CA097190 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Heath Devin Skinner, Jose P. Zevallos · 2004 to 2026
$49.6M
Research Training in OtolaryngologyT32DC000066 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JOHNSON, JONAS T. · 2003 to 2017
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA047904NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine which surgical factors are associated with quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes in oral cavity cancer survivors after free flap reconstruction of the oral cavity. PATIENTS AND

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted from a multidisciplinary head and neck cancer (HNC) survivorship clinic. Oral cavity cancer survivors with at least 6-months of postoperative follow-up from ablation and free flap reconstruction were included. Primary outcome measures were validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) measure of swallowing-specific QOL, University of Washington Quality of Life (UW-QOL) physical and social-emotional subscale scores and feeding tube dependence.

resultsExtent of tongue resection was associated with EAT-10 and the UW-QOL Physical subscale scores. Patients with oral tongue defects reported worse scores than with composite defects in the EAT-10 and UW-QOL physical domain (p = 0.0004, 0.0025, respectively). This association no longer applies when controlling for differences in extent of tongue resection. Patients with anterior composite resections reported worse EAT-10 scores than lateral resections (p = 0.024). This association no longer applies when controlling for extent of tongue resection (p = 0.46). Gastric tube dependence demonstrates similar trends to PROMs.

conclusionExtent of tongue resection was strongly associated with poor QOL outcomes after free tissue reconstruction of the oral cavity and mediates the associations between other defect characteristics and QOL. These findings demonstrate the need for emphasis on expected oral tongue defects when counseling patients and highlight the need to address QOL in a multidisciplinary fashion post-operatively.

Indexed as

Free Tissue FlapsPlastic Surgery ProceduresTongue NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesFree flapHead and neck cancerOral cavityQuality-of-lifeSurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID34715452
PMCPMC8978622
OpenAlexW3208106018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.