ArticleOral oncology2021
Surgical factors associated with patient-reported quality of life outcomes after free flap reconstruction of the oral cavity.
Article in Oral oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of Oncological Treatment on Quality of Life in Patients with Head and Neck Malignancies: A Systematic Literature Review (2020-2025).Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Pooled it
- Quality of Life After Head and Neck Cancer Surgery and Free Flap Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-facialePooled it
- Vascularized free flaps based oral reconstruction: a narrative review of dental functional outcomes.The Saudi dental journal · 2026Review
- Article
- Quality of Life before and after Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer Patients Measured Using an Updated Head-Neck Specific EORTC QLQ-H&N43 at a Rural Tertiary Cancer Care Center.South Asian journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Swallowing and Speaking Evaluation After Resection and Reconstruction Versus Definite Radiochemotherapy for (Sub)total Tongue Cancer.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- SCIP/SIEA and PAP: The New Workhorse Flaps in Soft Tissue Reconstruction for All Body Regions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo determine which surgical factors are associated with quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes in oral cavity cancer survivors after free flap reconstruction of the oral cavity. PATIENTS AND
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted from a multidisciplinary head and neck cancer (HNC) survivorship clinic. Oral cavity cancer survivors with at least 6-months of postoperative follow-up from ablation and free flap reconstruction were included. Primary outcome measures were validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) measure of swallowing-specific QOL, University of Washington Quality of Life (UW-QOL) physical and social-emotional subscale scores and feeding tube dependence.
resultsExtent of tongue resection was associated with EAT-10 and the UW-QOL Physical subscale scores. Patients with oral tongue defects reported worse scores than with composite defects in the EAT-10 and UW-QOL physical domain (p = 0.0004, 0.0025, respectively). This association no longer applies when controlling for differences in extent of tongue resection. Patients with anterior composite resections reported worse EAT-10 scores than lateral resections (p = 0.024). This association no longer applies when controlling for extent of tongue resection (p = 0.46). Gastric tube dependence demonstrates similar trends to PROMs.
conclusionExtent of tongue resection was strongly associated with poor QOL outcomes after free tissue reconstruction of the oral cavity and mediates the associations between other defect characteristics and QOL. These findings demonstrate the need for emphasis on expected oral tongue defects when counseling patients and highlight the need to address QOL in a multidisciplinary fashion post-operatively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.