Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34715346›Full record

ArticleClinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases2022

Dynamic SARS-CoV-2-specific B-cell and T-cell responses following immunization with an inactivated COVID-19 vaccine.

Yuxin Chen, Shengxia Yin, Xin Tong, Yue Tao, Jun Ni, Jie Pan, Ming Li, Yawen Wan, Minxin Mao, Yali Xiong and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific TSignal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yuxin ChenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China; Institute of Viruses and Infectious Diseases, Nanjing University, Jiangsu, China.
Shengxia YinDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China; Institute of Viruses and Infectious Diseases, Nanjing University, Jiangsu, China.
Xin TongDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China; Institute of Viruses and Infectious Diseases, Nanjing University, Jiangsu, China.
Yue TaoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Jun NiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Jie PanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Ming LiNanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Yawen WanDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Nanjing Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, China.
Minxin MaoNanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Yali XiongDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Xiaomin YanDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Yue YangDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Rui HuangDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China; Institute of Viruses and Infectious Diseases, Nanjing University, Jiangsu, China.
Chao WuDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China; Institute of Viruses and Infectious Diseases, Nanjing University, Jiangsu, China.
Han ShenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China. Electronic address: shenhan10366@sina.com.
Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital · CNNanjing University of Chinese Medicine · CNXuzhou Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe dynamic adaptive immune responses elicited by the inactivated virus vaccine CoronaVac remain elusive.

methodsIn a prospective cohort of 100 healthcare professionals naïve for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) who received two doses of CoronaVac, we analysed SARS-CoV-2-specific humoral and cellular responses at four different timepoints, including before vaccination (T1), 2 weeks after the first dose (T2), 2 weeks after the booster dose (T3), and 8-10 weeks after the booster dose (T4). SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies, serum neutralizing activities, peripheral B cells, CD4

resultsSARS-CoV-2 spike-specific IgG responses reached a peak (geometric mean titre (GMT) 54827, 30969-97065) after two doses and rapidly declined (GMT 502, 212-1190) at T4, whereas suboptimal IgA responses were detected (GMT 5, 2-9). Spike-specific circulating B cells (0.60%, 0.46-0.73% of total B cells) and memory B cells (1.18%, 0.92-1.44% of total memory B cells) were effectively induced at T3 and sustained over time (0.33%, 0.23-0.43%; 0.87%, 0.05-1.67%, respectively). SARS-CoV-2-specific circulating CD4

conclusionsCoronaVac induced robust circulating and memory B cell and T cell responses. Our study offers new insight into the underlying immunobiology of inactivated virus vaccines in humans and may have implications for vaccine strategies in the future.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2CD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansImmunizationProspective StudiesVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesAdaptive responsesB cellsCOVID-19Inactivated virus vaccineNeutralizationT cells

Identifiers

PMID34715346
PMCPMC8547974
OpenAlexW3209607274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.