Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34715060›Full record

SynthesisThe American journal of medicine2022

Oral Is the New IV. Challenging Decades of Blood and Bone Infection Dogma: A Systematic Review.

Noah Wald-Dickler, Paul D Holtom, Matthew C Phillips, Robert M Centor, Rachael A Lee, Rachel Baden, Brad Spellberg

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The American journal of medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Osteomyelitis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis : Statement of endorsement by the NVVC Full version.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Why we do what we do: a survey of ID providers about oral antibiotics.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026
    Article
  20. Review

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Noah Wald-DicklerLos Angeles County + University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles; Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles; Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Paul D HoltomLos Angeles County + University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles; Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Matthew C PhillipsLos Angeles County + University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles.
Robert M CentorDepartment of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham; Birmingham Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center, Birmingham, Ala.
Rachael A LeeDepartment of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham; Birmingham Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center, Birmingham, Ala.
Rachel BadenLos Angeles County + University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles.
Brad SpellbergLos Angeles County + University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles. Electronic address: bspellberg@dhs.lacounty.gov.
University of Southern California · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

MAb Passive Vaccination against Acinetobacter baumanniiR01AI130060 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI BRAD J SPELLBERG · 2017 to 2026
$6.7M
Humanized Monoclonal Antibody to Treat Acinetobacter InfectionsR42AI106375 · NIAID · BIOLOGICAL ANTI-INFECTIVE MEDICINES, LLC · PI ISLAM, KHALID · 2016 to 2018
$3.1M
Multivalent Adjuvant Immunization to Prevent Hospital Acquired InfectionsR41AI145759 · NIAID · EXBAQ LLC · PI SPELLBERG, BRAD J · 2020 to 2021
$594k
Humanized Monoclonal Antibodies to Treat Acinetobacter InfectionsR41AI106375 · NIAID · BIOLOGICAL ANTI-INFECTIVE MEDICINES, LLC · PI SPELLBERG, BRAD J · 2013 to 2014
$574k
Diabetes and Inflammation During InfectionR21AI127954 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI SPELLBERG, BRAD J · 2017 to 2018
$454k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI130060NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI127954NIAID NIH HHS R41 AI106375NIAID NIH HHS R41 AI145759NIAID NIH HHS R42 AI106375
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe sought to determine if controlled, prospective clinical data validate the long-standing belief that intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy is required for the full duration of treatment for 3 invasive bacterial infections: osteomyelitis, bacteremia, and infective endocarditis.

methodsWe performed a systematic review of published, prospective, controlled trials that compared IV-only to oral stepdown regimens in the treatment of these diseases. Using the PubMed database, we identified 7 relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of osteomyelitis, 9 of bacteremia, 1 including both osteomyelitis and bacteremia, and 3 of endocarditis, as well as one quasi-experimental endocarditis study. Study results were synthesized via forest plots and funnel charts (for risk of study bias), using RevMan 5.4.1 and Meta-Essentials freeware, respectively.

resultsThe 21 studies demonstrated either no difference in clinical efficacy, or superiority of oral versus IV-only antimicrobial therapy, including for mortality; in no study was IV-only treatment superior in efficacy. The frequency of catheter-related adverse events and duration of inpatient hospitalization were both greater in IV-only groups. DISCUSSION: Numerous prospective, controlled investigations demonstrate that oral antibiotics are at least as effective, safer, and lead to shorter hospitalizations than IV-only therapy; no contrary data were identified. Treatment guidelines should be modified to indicate that oral therapy is appropriate for reasonably selected patients with osteomyelitis, bacteremia, and endocarditis.

Indexed as

BacteremiaEndocarditisEndocarditis, BacterialOsteomyelitisAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaEndocarditisMeta-analysisOral antibioticsOsteomyelitis

Identifiers

PMID34715060
PMCPMC8901545
OpenAlexW3209878046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.