Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34714945›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental toxicology and chemistry2022

The Eco-Exposome Concept: Supporting an Integrated Assessment of Mixtures of Environmental Chemicals.

Stefan Scholz, John W Nichols, Beate I Escher, Gerald T Ankley, Rolf Altenburger, Brett Blackwell, Werner Brack, Lawrence Burkhard, Timothy W Collette, Jon A Doering and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Endocrine responses to environmental variation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Costs of molecular adaptation to the chemical exposome: a focus on xenobiotic metabolism pathways.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Untargeted MSACS ES&T water · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. The Exposome and Toxicology: A Win-Win Collaboration.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Stefan ScholzHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6990-4716
John W NicholsOffice of Research and Development, Great Lakes Ecology and Toxicology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota.
Beate I EscherHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5304-706X
Gerald T AnkleyOffice of Research and Development, Great Lakes Ecology and Toxicology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota.
Rolf AltenburgerHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.
Brett BlackwellOffice of Research and Development, Great Lakes Ecology and Toxicology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota.
Werner BrackHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.
Lawrence BurkhardOffice of Research and Development, Great Lakes Ecology and Toxicology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-6007-6280
Timothy W ColletteOffice of Research and Development, Ecosystem Processes Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, Georgia.
Jon A DoeringNational Research Council, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota.
Drew EkmanOffice of Research and Development, Ecosystem Processes Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, Georgia.
Kellie FayOffice of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Risk Assessment Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.ORCID 0000-0003-1132-4484
Fabian FischerHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.
Jörg HackermüllerHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4920-7072
Joel C HoffmanOffice of Research and Development, Great Lakes Ecology and Toxicology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota.
Chih LaiCollege of Arts and Sciences, University of Saint Thomas, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
David LeutholdHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.
Dalma Martinovic-WeigeltCollege of Arts and Sciences, University of Saint Thomas, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Thorsten ReemtsmaHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.
Nathan PolleschOffice of Research and Development, Great Lakes Ecology and Toxicology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota.
Anthony SchroederUniversity of Minnesota Crookston, Crookston, Minnesota, USA.
Gerrit SchüürmannHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.
Martin von BergenHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organisms are exposed to ever-changing complex mixtures of chemicals over the course of their lifetime. The need to more comprehensively describe this exposure and relate it to adverse health effects has led to formulation of the exposome concept in human toxicology. Whether this concept has utility in the context of environmental hazard and risk assessment has not been discussed in detail. In this Critical Perspective, we propose-by analogy to the human exposome-to define the eco-exposome as the totality of the internal exposure (anthropogenic and natural chemicals, their biotransformation products or adducts, and endogenous signaling molecules that may be sensitive to an anthropogenic chemical exposure) over the lifetime of an ecologically relevant organism. We describe how targeted and nontargeted chemical analyses and bioassays can be employed to characterize this exposure and discuss how the adverse outcome pathway concept could be used to link this exposure to adverse effects. Available methods, their limitations, and/or requirement for improvements for practical application of the eco-exposome concept are discussed. Even though analysis of the eco-exposome can be resource-intensive and challenging, new approaches and technologies make this assessment increasingly feasible. Furthermore, an improved understanding of mechanistic relationships between external chemical exposure(s), internal chemical exposure(s), and biological effects could result in the development of proxies, that is, relatively simple chemical and biological measurements that could be used to complement internal exposure assessment or infer the internal exposure when it is difficult to measure. Environ Toxicol Chem 2022;41:30-45. © 2021 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.

Indexed as

Adverse Outcome PathwaysExposomeEcotoxicologyEnvironmental ExposureHumansRisk AssessmentAdverse outcome pathwaysBiomonitoringExposomeExternal exposureInternal exposureSuspect screening

Identifiers

PMID34714945
PMCPMC9104394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.