Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34714864›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Longitudinal stability and interrelations between health behavior and subjective well-being in a follow-up of nine years.

Säde Stenlund, Niina Junttila, Heli Koivumaa-Honkanen, Lauri Sillanmäki, David Stenlund, Sakari Suominen, Hanna Lagström, Päivi Rautava

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Säde StenlundDepartment of Public Health, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-9945-2909
Niina JunttilaDepartment of Teacher Education, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Heli Koivumaa-HonkanenInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Psychiatry, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-5465-112X
Lauri SillanmäkiDepartment of Public Health, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
David StenlundFaculty of Science and Engineering, Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland.
Sakari SuominenDepartment of Public Health, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6648-603X
Hanna LagströmDepartment of Public Health, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-5069-6582
Päivi RautavaDepartment of Public Health, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
University of Turku · FIÅbo Akademi University · FIUniversity of Eastern Finland · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe bidirectional relationship between health behavior and subjective well-being has previously been studied sparsely, and mainly for individual health behaviors and regression models. In the present study, we deepen this knowledge focusing on the four principal health behaviors and using structural equation modeling with selected covariates.

methodsThe follow-up data (n = 11,804) was derived from a population-based random sample of working-age Finns from two waves (2003 and 2012) of the Health and Social Support (HeSSup) postal survey. Structural equation modeling was used to study the cross-sectional, cross-lagged, and longitudinal relationships between the four principal health behaviors and subjective well-being at baseline and after the nine-year follow-up adjusted for age, gender, education, and self-reported diseases. The included health behaviors were physical activity, dietary habits, alcohol consumption, and smoking status. Subjective well-being was measured through four items comprising happiness, interest, and ease in life, and perceived loneliness.

resultsBidirectionally, only health behavior in 2003 predicted subjective well-being in 2012, whereas subjective well-being in 2003 did not predict health behavior in 2012. In addition, the cross-sectional interactions in 2003 and in 2012 between health behavior and subjective well-being were statistically significant. The baseline levels predicted their respective follow-up levels, the effect being stronger in health behavior than in subjective well-being.

conclusionThe four principal health behaviors together predict subsequent subjective well-being after an extensive follow-up. Although not particularly strong, the results could still be used for motivation for health behavior change, because of the beneficial effects of health behavior on subjective well-being.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorPersonal SatisfactionAdultDiet, HealthyDrinking BehaviorEmotionsExerciseFemaleFinlandHumansMaleMiddle AgedSmoking

Identifiers

PMID34714864
PMCPMC8555827
OpenAlexW3209290247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.