Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34714862›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Decomposing spontaneous sign language into elementary movements: A principal component analysis-based approach.

Félix Bigand, Elise Prigent, Bastien Berret, Annelies Braffort

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. EEG of the Dancing Brain: Decoding Sensory, Motor, and Social Processes during Dyadic Dance.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Félix BigandUniversité Paris-Saclay, CNRS, LISN, Orsay, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6343-0433
Elise PrigentUniversité Paris-Saclay, CNRS, LISN, Orsay, France.
Bastien BerretUniversité Paris-Saclay, CIAMS, Institut Universitaire de France, Orsay, France.
Annelies BraffortUniversité Paris-Saclay, CNRS, LISN, Orsay, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sign Language (SL) is a continuous and complex stream of multiple body movement features. That raises the challenging issue of providing efficient computational models for the description and analysis of these movements. In the present paper, we used Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to decompose SL motion into elementary movements called principal movements (PMs). PCA was applied to the upper-body motion capture data of six different signers freely producing discourses in French Sign Language. Common PMs were extracted from the whole dataset containing all signers, while individual PMs were extracted separately from the data of individual signers. This study provides three main findings: (1) although the data were not synchronized in time across signers and discourses, the first eight common PMs contained 94.6% of the variance of the movements; (2) the number of PMs that represented 94.6% of the variance was nearly the same for individual as for common PMs; (3) the PM subspaces were highly similar across signers. These results suggest that upper-body motion in unconstrained continuous SL discourses can be described through the dynamic combination of a reduced number of elementary movements. This opens up promising perspectives toward providing efficient automatic SL processing tools based on heavy mocap datasets, in particular for automatic recognition and generation.

Indexed as

MovementSign LanguageAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMalePrincipal Component Analysis

Identifiers

PMID34714862
PMCPMC8555838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.