Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34714855›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Antimicrobial, antioxidant and cytotoxic properties of Chenopodium glaucum L.

Safi Ullah Khan, Faizan Ullah, Sultan Mehmood, Shah Fahad, Arsalan Ahmad Rahi, Fayez Althobaiti, Eldessoky S Dessoky, Shah Saud, Subhan Danish, Rahul Datta

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluation of cytotoxic, anti-oxidant, and apoptotic effects ofIranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Structural Characteristics ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Safi Ullah KhanDepartment of Botany, University of Science and Technology Bannu, Bannu, KP, Pakistan.
Faizan UllahDepartment of Botany, University of Science and Technology Bannu, Bannu, KP, Pakistan.
Sultan MehmoodDepartment of Botany, University of Science and Technology Bannu, Bannu, KP, Pakistan.
Shah FahadHainan Key Laboratory for Sustainable Utilization of Tropical Bioresource, College of Tropical Crops, Hainan University, Haikou Hainan, China.
Arsalan Ahmad RahiDepartment of Engineering, Faculty of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1674-179X
Fayez AlthobaitiDepartment of Biotechnology, College of Science, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-3961-7935
Eldessoky S DessokyDepartment of Biology, College of Science, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Shah SaudDepartment of Horticulture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China.
Subhan DanishDepartment of Soil Science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Punjab, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-1612-107X
Rahul DattaFaculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Department of Geology and Pedology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-9001-2555

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated phytochemical composition, antibacterial, antifungal, anti-oxidant and cytotoxic properties of aqueous (water) and organic extracts (methanol, ethyl acetate and n-hexane) of Chenopodium glaucum. Highest phenolic content 45 mg gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/g d.w was found in aqueous extract followed by ethyl acetate (41mg GAE/g d.w) and methanol extract (34.46 mg GAE/g d.w). Antibacterial potential of aqueous and organic extracts of C. glaucum was examined against Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus epidermidis. The aqueous, methanolic, ethyl acetate, and n-hexane extract showed antibacterial activity against A. baumannii, K. pneumoniae, E. coli and S. epidermidis. However, against A. baumannii significantly higher inhibition zone (19 mm and 18.96 mm respectively) was shown by ethyl acetate and methanol extracts. Aqueous extract possessed highest growth inhibition (11 mm) against E. coli. Aqueous, ethyl acetate and methanol extracts showed 9 mm, 10 mm, and 10.33 mm zone of inhibition against the K. pneumoniae. For antifungal activity, the extracts were less effective against Aspergillus niger but showed strong antifungal activity against Aspergillus flavus (A. flavus). The antioxidant activity was measured as DPPH (2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl), H2O2 and ABTS (2, 2'-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) scavenging activity of free radicals. All the organic extracts of C. glaucum possessed ABTS, DPPH and H2O2 scavenging properties. The highest cytotoxic activity measured as half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) against human lungs carcinoma cells was recorded for methanolic (IC50 = 16 μg/mL) and n-hexane (IC50 = 25 μg/mL) extracts, respectively. The Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis showed 4 major and 26 minor compounds in n-hexane extract and 4 major and 7 minor compounds in methanol extract of the C. glaucum. It is concluded that aqueous and organic extracts of C. glaucum would be potential therapeutic agents and could be exploited on a pilot scale to treat human pathogenic diseases.

Indexed as

Acinetobacter baumanniiAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsAntioxidantsAspergillusCell Line, TumorChenopodiumCytotoxinsEscherichia coliHumansKlebsiella pneumoniaeLung NeoplasmsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPhytochemicalsPlant ExtractsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsAntioxidantsCytotoxinsPhytochemicalsPlant Extracts

Identifiers

PMID34714855
PMCPMC8555819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.