Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34714495›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2022

Power spectrum and spectrogram of EEG analysis during general anesthesia: Python-based computer programming analysis.

Teiji Sawa, Tomomi Yamada, Yurie Obata

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. A deep learning mixed-data type approach for the classification of FHR signals.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Teiji SawaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan. anesth@koto.kpu-m.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-9558-9011
Tomomi YamadaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Yurie ObataDepartment of Anesthesia, Yodogawa Christian Hospital, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The commonly used principle for measuring the depth of anesthesia involves changes in the frequency components of the electroencephalogram (EEG) under general anesthesia. Therefore, it is essential to construct an effective spectrum and spectrogram to analyze the relationship between the depth of anesthesia and the EEG frequency during general anesthesia. This paper reviews the computer programming techniques for analyzing the spectrum and spectrogram derived from a single-channel EEG recorded during general anesthesia. A periodogram is obtained by repeating a Fourier transform on EEG segments separated by short time intervals, but spectral leakage (i.e., dissociation from the true spectrum) occurs as a consequence of unnatural segmentation and noise. While offsetting the securing of the dynamic range, practical analyses of the adaptation of the window function are explained. Finally, the multitaper method, which can suppress artifacts caused by the edges of the analysis segments, suppress noise, and probabilistically infer values that are close to the real power spectral density, is explained using practical examples of the analysis. All analyses were performed and all graphs plotted using Python under Jupyter Notebook. The analyses demonstrated the effectiveness of Python-based programming under the integrated development environment Jupyter Notebook for constructing an effective spectrum and spectrogram for analyzing the relationship between the depth of anesthesia and EEG frequency analysis in general anesthesia.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, GeneralElectroencephalographyArtifactsComputersHumansEEGGeneral anesthesiaMultitaper methodSpectrogramSpectrum analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.