Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34714468›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2021

Automated high throughput pK

Matthew N Bahr, Aakankschit Nandkeolyar, John K Kenna, Neysa Nevins, Luigi Da Vià, Mehtap Işık, John D Chodera, David L Mobley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Unifying pJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
  2. Benchmarking pJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Interpretable Deep-Learning pJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Automated high throughput pKJournal of computer-aided molecular design · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Matthew N Bahr *Pharmaceutical Research and Development, GlaxoSmithKline, 1250 South Collegeville Road, Collegeville, PA, 19426, USA. matthew.n.bahr@gsk.com.
Aakankschit Nandkeolyar *Pharmaceutical Research and Development, GlaxoSmithKline, 1250 South Collegeville Road, Collegeville, PA, 19426, USA.
John K KennaPharmaceutical Research and Development, GlaxoSmithKline, 1250 South Collegeville Road, Collegeville, PA, 19426, USA.
Neysa NevinsPharmaceutical Research and Development, GlaxoSmithKline, 1250 South Collegeville Road, Collegeville, PA, 19426, USA.
Luigi Da ViàPharmaceutical Research and Development, GlaxoSmithKline, Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, SG1 2NY, UK.
Mehtap IşıkComputational and Systems Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
John D ChoderaComputational and Systems Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
David L MobleyDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Department of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.

Funding

Advancing predictive physical modeling through focused development of model systems to drive new modeling innovationsR01GM124270 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI MOBLEY, DAVID LOWELL · 2018 to 2021
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of the Statistical Assessment of the Modeling of Proteins and Ligands (SAMPL) challenge is to improve the accuracy of current computational models to estimate free energy of binding, deprotonation, distribution and other associated physical properties that are useful for the design of new pharmaceutical products. New experimental datasets of physicochemical properties provide opportunities for prospective evaluation of computational prediction methods. Here, aqueous pK

Indexed as

Models, ChemicalAutomationDrug DiscoveryLigandsMolecular StructurePharmaceutical PreparationsProteinsLigandsPharmaceutical PreparationsProteinsAcid dissociation constantsBlind prediction challengeDistribution coefficientsHigh throughput experimentationpH-solubility profilesSAMPL

Identifiers

PMID34714468
PMCPMC9313606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.