Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34714444›Full record

ArticleMarine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.)2021

An Efficient DNA Extraction for a Blue Xestospongia sp. Sponge and Its Associated Microorganisms Containing Cytotoxic Substances.

Thaniwan Cheun-Arom, Taksina Chuanasa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Marine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 86% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thaniwan Cheun-AromDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Ramkhamhaeng University, Bangkok, 10240, Thailand.
Taksina ChuanasaDepartment of Pharmacognosy and Pharmaceutical Botany, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand. Taksina.c@pharm.chula.ac.th.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5302-4995
Chulalongkorn University · THRamkhamhaeng University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extraction of high quantity and quality DNAs from marine sponges, which contain diverse and abundant microbial communities, is important to molecular biology techniques for the analysis of nucleic acids. Several marine sponges and their associated microorganisms have been known to produce cytotoxic natural products on several cancer cell lines via DNA damage mechanisms. These marine cytotoxic substances might be one of the factors that cause the low quantity and quality of DNAs during the DNA extraction from its living origin. Therefore, the extraction of DNA of a Thai blue marine sponge Xestospongia sp. with sufficient purity and quantity for molecular study can be challenging. In this study, we developed an efficient extraction method to prepare DNAs from a Thai blue marine sponge Xestospongia sp. which accumulated a highly potent cytotoxic alkaloid with DNA-damaging activity, named Renieramycin M (RM), as a major constituent in high quantity. We demonstrated that removal of RM from the sponge samples by a simple methanolic extraction before DNA extraction dramatically increased the yield and purity of DNAs compared to the RM-unremoved sponge samples. High molecular weight (HMW) genomic DNA was obtained from sponge samples with 8 times of RM elimination by using modified NaOAc salting-out extraction method. The quantity and quality of the prepared DNAs were comparatively determined via spectrophotometry, electrophoresis, and 16S rRNA gene amplification. Our result suggests that the removal of DNA-damaging constituents from the samples is a crucial step and must be seriously taken as the necessary consideration for the practical protocol of DNA extraction.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsPoriferaXestospongiaAnimalsDNAPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAntineoplastic AgentsDNARNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNA damageDNA extractionMarine spongeRenieramycins

Identifiers

PMID34714444
OpenAlexW3210650435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.