Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34714423›Full record

Trial reportGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2022

Prognostic value of tumor markers and ctDNA in patients with resectable gastric cancer receiving perioperative treatment: results from the CRITICS trial.

Astrid E Slagter, Marieke A Vollebergh, Irene A Caspers, Johanna W van Sandick, Karolina Sikorska, Pehr Lind, Marianne Nordsmark, Hein Putter, Jeffrey P B M Braak, Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00407186 (A Multicenter Randomized Phase III Trial of Neo-adjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery and Chemotherapy or by Surgery and Chemoradiotherapy in Resectable Gastric Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00407186 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

A Multicenter Randomized Phase III Trial of Neo-adjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery and Chemotherapy or by Surgery and Chemoradiotherapy in Resectable Gastric Cancer (CRITICS Study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorDutch Colorectal Cancer GroupRan2007 to 2025Enrolled788ConditionsGastric CancerArmscisplatin+capecitabine, radiotherapy, epirubicin+cisplatin+capecitabine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Predictive value of preoperative L3-SMI, AGR, and PNI for overall survival in patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. LaparoscopicWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Astrid E SlagterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marieke A VolleberghDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Irene A CaspersDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Johanna W van SandickDepartment of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Karolina SikorskaDepartment of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pehr LindDepartment of Oncology, Stockholm Söder Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Marianne NordsmarkDepartment of Medical Oncology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Hein PutterDepartment of Biometrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jeffrey P B M BraakDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Elma Meershoek-Klein KranenbargDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Cornelis J H van de VeldeDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Edwin P M JansenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Annemieke CatsDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hanneke W M van LaarhovenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nicole C T van GriekenDepartment of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marcel VerheijDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Marcel.Verheij@radboudumc.nl.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLAarhus University · DKAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLStockholm South General Hospital · SEUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the prognostic value of tumor markers in a European cohort of patients with resectable gastric cancer.

methodsWe performed a post hoc analysis of the CRITICS trial, in which 788 patients received perioperative therapy. Association between survival and pretreatment CEA, CA 19-9, alkaline phosphatase, neutrophils, hemoglobin and lactate dehydrogenase were explored in uni- and multivariable Cox regression analyses. Likelihoods to receive potentially curative surgery were investigated for patients without elevated tumor markers versus one of the tumor markers elevated versus both tumor markers elevated. The association between tumor markers and the presence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was explored in 50 patients with available ctDNA data.

resultsIn multivariable analysis, in which we corrected for allocated treatment and other baseline characteristics, elevated pretreatment CEA (HR 1.43; 95% CI 1.11-1.85, p < 0.001) and CA 19-9 (HR 1.79; 95% CI 1.42-2.25, p < 0.001) were associated with worse OS. Likelihoods to receive potentially curative surgery were 86%, 77% and 60% for patients without elevated tumor marker versus either elevated CEA or CA 19-9 versus both elevated, respectively (p < 0.001). Although both preoperative presence of ctDNA and tumor markers were prognostic for survival, no association was found between these two parameters.

conclusionCEA and CA 19-9 were independent prognostic factors for survival in a large cohort of European patients with resectable gastric cancer. No relationship was found between tumor markers and ctDNA. These factors could potentially guide treatment choices and should be included in future trials to determine their definitive position.

trial registrationClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT00407186. EudraCT number: 2006-00413032.

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNAStomach NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorHumansPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNACA 19-9CEActDNAResectable gastric cancerTumor markers

Identifiers

PMID34714423
PMCPMC8882113
OpenAlexW3210966016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.