ArticleEJNMMI research2021
Semi-quantitative measurements of chemokine receptor 4-targeted
Article in EJNMMI research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- The CXCR4-targeted theranostics era: a comprehensive review of a decade of progress (2015-2025).Theranostics · 2026Review
- Reduced splenic uptake of [EJNMMI research · 2025Article
- The Clinical Role of CXCR4-Targeted PET on Lymphoproliferative Disorders: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Nanobiotechnology augmented cancer stem cell guided management of cancer: liquid-biopsy, imaging, and treatment.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Review
- Advances in PET Imaging of the CXCR4 Receptor: [Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2024Review
- The performance and applied value ofAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose
methodsFifteen patients with WM/LPL were recruited in a prospective cohort study and underwent both
resultsAfter chemotherapy, 5 patients had complete response or very good partial response, 8 had partial response or minimal response and 2 had progressive disease. In quantitative analysis,
conclusionsThe semi-quantitative measurements of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.