ReviewAnaesthesiology intensive therapy2021
Gender reassignment surgery - a narrative overview of anaesthetic considerations and implications.
Review in Anaesthesiology intensive therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The twenty-first century, with its transforming ideology and rising acceptance, is witnessing an increased number of transgender people applying for gender reassignment surgery (GRS). The procedure of GRS is a lengthy and complex one involving the active collaboration of multiple disciplines including psychology, psychiatry, family medicine, plastic surgery, endocrinology, otolaryngology, urology, gynaecology, maxillofacial surgery, and anaesthesiology. The considerable paucity of literature regarding the management of patients presenting for GRS places health care providers at a disadvantage. It is imperative to cautiously regard the specific medical, emotional, social, and economic concerns regarding these patients. Health care providers need to be trained well to deal empathetically with such patients. The present literature about GRS deals mainly with the surgeon's perspective, while the anaesthetist's approach remains hazy. This is because GRS imposes the need for anaesthesiologists to search for better and more efficient modes of anaesthesia so as to improve prognosis and minimize the associated morbidity. Anaesthetists should understand the associated psychological aspects and effects of hormone therapy while performing an extensive and informative pre-operative evaluation to formulate an effective strategy. Providing the optimal modes for anaesthesia and keeping a cautious watch for complications along with timely intervention in the advent of the same comprise the approach for high-quality anaesthetic care. This review aims to provide a detailed overview of significant considerations and competent peri-operative outcomes in patients presenting for GRS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.