Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34713887›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2021

A magnet attached to the forehead disrupts magnetic compass orientation in a migratory songbird.

Florian Packmor, Dmitry Kishkinev, Flora Bittermann, Barbara Kofler, Clara Machowetz, Thomas Zechmeister, Lucinda C Zawadzki, Tim Guilford, Richard A Holland

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Florian PackmorSchool of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor LL57 2UW, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1512-2444
Dmitry KishkinevSchool of Life Sciences, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme ST5 5BG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2619-1197
Flora BittermannBiological Station Lake Neusiedl, Illmitz 7142, Austria.
Barbara KoflerBiological Station Lake Neusiedl, Illmitz 7142, Austria.
Clara MachowetzBiological Station Lake Neusiedl, Illmitz 7142, Austria.
Thomas ZechmeisterBiological Station Lake Neusiedl, Illmitz 7142, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4453-2557
Lucinda C ZawadzkiDepartment of Zoology, Oxford University, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1088-8843
Tim GuilfordDepartment of Zoology, Oxford University, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3447-8443
Richard A HollandSchool of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor LL57 2UW, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4495-8061
Bangor University · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · ATKeele University · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R001081/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For studies on magnetic compass orientation and navigation performance in small bird species, controlled experiments with orientation cages inside an electromagnetic coil system are the most prominent methodological paradigm. These are, however, not applicable when studying larger bird species and/or orientation behaviour during free flight. For this, researchers have followed a very different approach, attaching small magnets to birds, with the intention of depriving them of access to meaningful magnetic information. Unfortunately, results from studies using this approach appear rather inconsistent. As these are based on experiments with birds under free-flight conditions, which usually do not allow exclusion of other potential orientation cues, an assessment of the overall efficacy of this approach is difficult to conduct. Here, we directly tested the efficacy of small magnets for temporarily disrupting magnetic compass orientation in small migratory songbirds using orientation cages under controlled experimental conditions. We found that birds which have access to the Earth's magnetic field as their sole orientation cue show a general orientation towards their seasonally appropriate migratory direction. When carrying magnets on their forehead under these conditions, the same birds become disoriented. However, under changed conditions that allow birds access to other (i.e. celestial) orientation cues, any disruptive effect of the magnets they carry appears obscured. Our results provide clear evidence for the efficacy of the magnet approach for temporarily disrupting magnetic compass orientation in birds, but also reveal its limitations for application in experiments under free-flight conditions.

Indexed as

SongbirdsTaxis ResponseAnimal MigrationAnimalsForeheadMagnetic FieldsMagneticsMagnetsOrientationCelestial compassEnvironmental cueEurasian reed warblerMigrationNavigationOrientationOrientation cageSongbirdStar compass

Identifiers

PMID34713887
PMCPMC8645232
OpenAlexW3209527806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.