Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34713592›Full record

ArticleThoracic cancer2021

Predictive value of a novel Asian lung cancer screening nomogram based on artificial intelligence and epidemiological characteristics.

Dahai Liu, Xiao Sun, Ao Liu, Lun Li, Shaoke Li, Jinmiao Li, Xiaojun Liu, Yu Yang, Zhe Wu, Xiaoliang Leng and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Thoracic cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Risk prediction for lung cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-regression.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Dahai LiuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Xiao SunDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Ao LiuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Lun LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, China.
Shaoke LiDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Jinmiao LiDepartment of IT Management, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Xiaojun LiuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Qingdao Chengyang District People's Hospital, Qingdao, China.
Yu YangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Zhe WuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Xiaoliang LengDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Yang WoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Zhangfeng HuangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Wenhao SuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Wenxing DuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Tianxiang YuanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Wenjie JiaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo develop and validate a risk prediction nomogram based on a deep learning convolutional neural networks (CNN) model and epidemiological characteristics for lung cancer screening in patients with small pulmonary nodules (SPN).

methodsThis study included three data sets. First, a CNN model was developed and tested on data set 1. Then, a hybrid prediction model was developed on data set 2 by multivariable binary logistic regression analysis. We combined the CNN model score and the selected epidemiological risk factors, and a risk prediction nomogram was presented. An independent multicenter cohort was used for model external validation. The performance of the nomogram was assessed with respect to its calibration and discrimination.

resultsThe final hybrid model included the CNN model score and the screened risk factors included age, gender, smoking status and family history of cancer. The nomogram showed good discrimination and calibration with an area under the curve (AUC) of 91.6% (95% CI: 89.4%-93.5%), compare with the CNN model, the improvement was significance. The performance of the nomogram still showed good discrimination and good calibration in the multicenter validation cohort, with an AUC of 88.3% (95% CI: 83.1%-92.3%).

conclusionsOur study showed that epidemiological characteristics should be considered in lung cancer screening, which can significantly improve the efficiency of the artificial intelligence (AI) model alone. We combined the CNN model score with Asian lung cancer epidemiological characteristics to develop a new nomogram to facilitate and accurately perform individualized lung cancer screening, especially for Asians.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNomogramsAgedChinaEarly Detection of CancerEpidemiologic MethodsFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTomography, X-Ray Computedartificial intelligenceAsians lung cancer screeningconvolutional neural networksepidemiological characteristicsnomogram

Identifiers

PMID34713592
PMCPMC8636223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.