ArticleMemory & cognition2022
Individual Differences in Disqualifying Monitoring Underlie False Recognition of Associative and Conjunction Lures.
Article in Memory & cognition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Do cognitive abilities reduce eyewitness susceptibility to the misinformation effect? A systematic review.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2024Pooled it
- Are Creative People More Susceptible to False Memory? Evidence for Age- and Task-Related Differences.Creativity research journal · 2026Article
- Examining memory specificity and generalization contributions to false recall in DRM paradigm.Research square · 2026Article
- Age-related changes in susceptibility to false memories in different tasks.Memory & cognition · 2026Article
- Exploring the neural underpinnings of semantic and perceptual false memory formation.Neuropsychologia · 2026Article
- Investigating the Cognitive Correlates of Semantic and Perceptual False Memory in Older and Younger Adults: A Multi-Group Latent Variable Approach.Journal of memory and language · 2025Article
- Neural basis of false recognition in Alzheimer's disease and dementia with lewy bodies.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Hands-on false memories: a combined study with distributional semantics and mouse-tracking.Psychological research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current study leveraged experimental and individual differences methodology to examine whether false memories across different list-learning tasks arise from a common cause. Participants completed multiple false memory (associative and conjunction lure), working memory (operation and reading span), and source monitoring (verbal and picture) tasks. Memory discriminability in the associative and conjunction tasks loaded onto a single (general) factor and were unaffected by warnings provided at encoding. Consistent with previous research, source-monitoring ability fully mediated the relation between working memory and false memories. Moreover, individuals with higher source monitoring-ability were better able to recall contextual information from encoding to correctly reject lures. These results suggest that there are stable individual differences in false remembering across tasks. The commonality across tasks may be due, at least in part, to the ability to effectively use disqualifying monitoring processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34713420What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.