Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34713330›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2022

Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative dual-energy CT-based volumetric bone mineral density assessment for the prediction of osteoporosis-associated fractures.

Leon D Gruenewald, Vitali Koch, Simon S Martin, Ibrahim Yel, Katrin Eichler, Tatjana Gruber-Rouh, Lukas Lenga, Julian L Wichmann, Leona S Alizadeh, Moritz H Albrecht and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. CT image-based biomarkers for opportunistic screening of osteoporotic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Cyclic testing of standalone ALIF versus TLIF in lumbosacral spines of low bone mineral density: an ex vivo biomechanical study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Trabecular bone mineral density as measured by thoracic vertebrae predicts incident hip and vertebral fractures: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Leon D GruenewaldClinic of the Johann-Wolfgang Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Vitali KochClinic of the Johann-Wolfgang Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Simon S MartinClinic of the Johann-Wolfgang Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Ibrahim YelClinic of the Johann-Wolfgang Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Katrin EichlerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Tatjana Gruber-RouhDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Lukas LengaClinic of the Johann-Wolfgang Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Julian L WichmannClinic of the Johann-Wolfgang Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Leona S AlizadehClinic of the Johann-Wolfgang Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Moritz H AlbrechtClinic of the Johann-Wolfgang Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Christoph MaderDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Nicole A HuizingaDepartment of Biological Psychology, Vrije University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tommaso D'AngeloDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Morphological and Functional Imaging, University Hospital Messina, Messina, Italy.
Silvio MazziottiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Morphological and Functional Imaging, University Hospital Messina, Messina, Italy.
Stefan WesargFraunhofer IGD, Darmstadt, Germany.
Thomas J VoglDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Christian BoozClinic of the Johann-Wolfgang Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. boozchristian@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1052-7389
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEUniversity of Messina · ITFraunhofer Institute for Computer Graphics Research · DEVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the predictive value of volumetric bone mineral density (BMD) assessment of the lumbar spine derived from phantomless dual-energy CT (DECT)-based volumetric material decomposition as an indicator for the 2-year occurrence risk of osteoporosis-associated fractures.

methodsL1 of 92 patients (46 men, 46 women; mean age, 64 years, range, 19-103 years) who had undergone third-generation dual-source DECT between 01/2016 and 12/2018 was retrospectively analyzed. For phantomless BMD assessment, dedicated DECT postprocessing software using material decomposition was applied. Digital files of all patients were sighted for 2 years following DECT to obtain the incidence of osteoporotic fractures. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to calculate cut-off values and logistic regression models were used to determine associations of BMD, sex, and age with the occurrence of osteoporotic fractures.

resultsA DECT-derived BMD cut-off of 93.70 mg/cm

conclusionsRetrospective DECT-based volumetric BMD assessment can accurately predict the 2-year risk to sustain an osteoporosis-associated fracture in at-risk patients without requiring a calibration phantom. Lower DECT-based BMD values are strongly associated with an increased risk to sustain fragility fractures. KEY POINTS: •Dual-energy CT-derived assessment of bone mineral density can identify patients at risk to sustain osteoporosis-associated fractures with a sensitivity of 85.45% and a specificity of 89.19%. •The DECT-derived BMD threshold for identification of at-risk patients lies above the American College of Radiology (ACR) QCT guidelines for the identification of osteoporosis (93.70 mg/cm

Indexed as

OsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesAbsorptiometry, PhotonAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBone DensityFemaleHumansLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedYoung AdultBone densityBone diseases, MetabolicCT dual-energy computed tomographyOsteoporosisOsteoporotic fractures

Identifiers

PMID34713330
PMCPMC9038932
OpenAlexW3210196008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.