ReviewHuman genetics2022
The promise of automated machine learning for the genetic analysis of complex traits.
Review in Human genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sustainable Mix Design of Sugarcane Bagasse Ash Concrete via AutoML-Assisted Multi-Objective Optimization.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Sex-dependent prediction of autism.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Insulin Resistance Indices Predict Mortality in Cardiovascular Disease: A Large-Scale NHANES Study With Machine Learning Validation.Food science & nutrition · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in biology and medicine.Die Naturwissenschaften · 2025Review
- Opportunities, challenges and future perspectives of using bioinformatics and artificial intelligence techniques on tropical disease identification using omics data.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Review
- A review of model evaluation metrics for machine learning in genetics and genomics.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- Article
- Precision Medicine Approaches with Metabolomics and Artificial Intelligence.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The genetic analysis of complex traits has been dominated by parametric statistical methods due to their theoretical properties, ease of use, computational efficiency, and intuitive interpretation. However, there are likely to be patterns arising from complex genetic architectures which are more easily detected and modeled using machine learning methods. Unfortunately, selecting the right machine learning algorithm and tuning its hyperparameters can be daunting for experts and non-experts alike. The goal of automated machine learning (AutoML) is to let a computer algorithm identify the right algorithms and hyperparameters thus taking the guesswork out of the optimization process. We review the promises and challenges of AutoML for the genetic analysis of complex traits and give an overview of several approaches and some example applications to omics data. It is our hope that this review will motivate studies to develop and evaluate novel AutoML methods and software in the genetics and genomics space. The promise of AutoML is to enable anyone, regardless of training or expertise, to apply machine learning as part of their genetic analysis strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.