ReviewFrontiers in genome editing2021
Neuronal Cell-type Engineering by Transcriptional Activation.
Review in Frontiers in genome editing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Directing stem cell differentiation by chromatin state approximation.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Efficient DNA- and virus-free engineering of cellular transcriptomic states using dCas9 ribonucleoprotein (dRNP) complexes.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- A systematic screening assay identifies efficient small guide RNAs for CRISPR activation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- The Current Situation and Development Prospect of Whole-Genome Screening.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- A Survey of Transcription Factors in Cell Fate Control.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Dead Cas(t) light on new life: CRISPRa-mediated reprogramming of somatic cells into neurons.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gene activation with the CRISPR-Cas system has great implications in studying gene function, controlling cellular behavior, and modulating disease progression. In this review, we survey recent studies on targeted gene activation and multiplexed screening for inducing neuronal differentiation using CRISPR-Cas transcriptional activation (CRISPRa) and open reading frame (ORF) expression. Critical technical parameters of CRISPRa and ORF-based strategies for neuronal programming are presented and discussed. In addition, recent progress on
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.