Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34713260›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genome editing2021

Off-Target Analysis in Gene Editing and Applications for Clinical Translation of CRISPR/Cas9 in HIV-1 Therapy.

Andrew Atkins, Cheng-Han Chung, Alexander G Allen, Will Dampier, Theodore E Gurrola, Ilker K Sariyer, Michael R Nonnemacher, Brian Wigdahl

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genome editing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew AtkinsDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Cheng-Han ChungDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Alexander G AllenDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Will DampierDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Theodore E GurrolaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Ilker K SariyerDepartment of Neuroscience and Center for Neurovirology, Temple University Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Michael R NonnemacherDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Brian WigdahlDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Drexel University · USInstitute for Molecular Medicine · USTemple University · USThomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

Viral Gene Editing and Bioinformatics Core for Institution # 269291P30MH092177 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI SHOHREH AMINI · 2011 to 2026
$24.9M
Gene editing strategies to target HIV for elimination in periphery and brainR01MH110360 · NIMH · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI Ilker Kudret Sariyer, Brian Wigdahl · 2016 to 2026
$7.3M
Interdisciplinary And Translational Research Training In NeurohivT32MH079785 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI Kamel Khalili · 2008 to 2026
$5.4M
NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH092177NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH110360NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH079785
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As genome-editing nucleases move toward broader clinical applications, the need to define the limits of their specificity and efficiency increases. A variety of approaches for nuclease cleavage detection have been developed, allowing a full-genome survey of the targeting landscape and the detection of a variety of repair outcomes for nuclease-induced double-strand breaks. Each approach has advantages and disadvantages relating to the means of target-site capture, target enrichment mechanism, cellular environment, false discovery, and validation of bona fide off-target cleavage sites in cells. This review examines the strengths, limitations, and origins of the different classes of off-target cleavage detection systems including anchored primer enrichment (GUIDE-seq),

Indexed as

CIRCLE-seqCRISPRDISCOVER-seqGUIDE-seqHIV-1off-targetunbiased genome-widewhole genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID34713260
PMCPMC8525399
OpenAlexW3195239877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.