Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34713237›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genome editing2020

Genomic Engineering in Human Hematopoietic Stem Cells: Hype or Hope?

Stefanie Klaver-Flores, Hidde A Zittersteijn, Kirsten Canté-Barrett, Arjan Lankester, Rob C Hoeben, Manuel A F V Gonçalves, Karin Pike-Overzet, Frank J T Staal

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genome editing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Stem Cell-Based Therapeutic Approaches in Genetic Diseases.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Towards Biomanufacturing of Cell-Derived Matrices.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stefanie Klaver-FloresDepartment of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Hidde A ZittersteijnDepartment of Cell and Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Kirsten Canté-BarrettDepartment of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Arjan LankesterDepartment of Pediatrics, Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Rob C HoebenDepartment of Cell and Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Manuel A F V GonçalvesDepartment of Cell and Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Karin Pike-OverzetDepartment of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Frank J T StaalDepartment of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many gene editing techniques are developed and tested, yet, most of these are optimized for transformed cell lines, which differ from their primary cell counterparts in terms of transfectability, cell death propensity, differentiation capability, and chromatin accessibility to gene editing tools. Researchers are working to overcome the challenges associated with gene editing of primary cells, namely, at the level of improving the gene editing tool components, e.g., the use of modified single guide RNAs, more efficient delivery of Cas9 and RNA in the ribonucleoprotein of these cells. Despite these efforts, the low efficiency of proper gene editing in true primary cells is an obstacle that needs to be overcome in order to generate sufficiently high numbers of corrected cells for therapeutic use. In addition, many of the therapeutic candidate genes for gene editing are expressed in more mature blood cell lineages but not in the hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), where they are tightly packed in heterochromatin, making them less accessible to gene editing enzymes. Bringing HSCs in proliferation is sometimes seen as a solution to overcome lack of chromatin access, but the induction of proliferation in HSCs often is associated with loss of stemness. The documented occurrences of off-target effects and, importantly, on-target side effects also raise important safety issues. In conclusion, many obstacles still remain to be overcome before gene editing in HSCs for gene correction purposes can be applied clinically. In this review, in a perspective way, we will discuss the challenges of researching and developing a novel genetic engineering therapy for monogenic blood and immune system disorders.

Indexed as

clinicCRISPR-Cas9gene editinggenomic engineeringhematopoietic stem cellsstem cell biologytherapeutic

Identifiers

PMID34713237
PMCPMC8525357
OpenAlexW3123857397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.