Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34713115›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in digital health2021

Accessing Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Decision-Making.

Chris Giordano, Meghan Brennan, Basma Mohamed, Parisa Rashidi, François Modave, Patrick Tighe

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07788872 (MORESP, MOre REalistic Spine Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 117 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
117citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07788872 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

MORESP, MOre REalistic Spine Patients: Assessing the Effect of a Predictive Tool ("Dialogue Support") in Relation to Expectations, Post-surgical Outcomes and Surgery Cancellations in Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Spinal Disorders, as Well as Inter-rater Reliability Between Surgeons.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, AkershusRan2026 to 2031Enrolled440ConditionsSpinal Stenosis Lumbar, Disc Herniation, Lumbar, Degenrative Disc DiseaseArmsDialogue Support Consultation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

117 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Detection of parkinson's disease with neuroimaging modalities using machine learning and artificial intelligence: a systematic review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chris GiordanoDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Meghan BrennanDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Basma MohamedDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Parisa RashidiJ. Clayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
François ModaveDepartment of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Patrick TigheDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, United States.

Funding

PRECEDE: PREsurgical Cognitive Evaluation via Digital clockfacEdrawingR01AG055337 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI CATHERINE E PRICE, Parisa Rashidi · 2017 to 2026
$3.2M
Finding Good TEMporal PostOperative pain Signatures (TEMPOS)R01GM114290 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI TIGHE, PATRICK J · 2015 to 2019
$2.5M
Intelligent Intensive Care Unit (I2CU): Pervasive Sensing and Artificial Intelligence for Augmented Clinical Decision-makingR01EB029699 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BIHORAC, AZRA, RASHIDI, PARISA · 2021 to 2024
$2.4M
Autonomous Pain Recognition in Non-Verbal and Critically Ill PatientsR21EB027344 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI RASHIDI, PARISA · 2019 to 2022
$577k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG055337NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB029699NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB027344NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114290
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancements in computing and data from the near universal acceptance and implementation of electronic health records has been formative for the growth of personalized, automated, and immediate patient care models that were not previously possible. Artificial intelligence (AI) and its subfields of machine learning, reinforcement learning, and deep learning are well-suited to deal with such data. The authors in this paper review current applications of AI in clinical medicine and discuss the most likely future contributions that AI will provide to the healthcare industry. For instance, in response to the need to risk stratify patients, appropriately cultivated and curated data can assist decision-makers in stratifying preoperative patients into risk categories, as well as categorizing the severity of ailments and health for non-operative patients admitted to hospitals. Previous overt, traditional vital signs and laboratory values that are used to signal alarms for an acutely decompensating patient may be replaced by continuously monitoring and updating AI tools that can pick up early imperceptible patterns predicting subtle health deterioration. Furthermore, AI may help overcome challenges with multiple outcome optimization limitations or sequential decision-making protocols that limit individualized patient care. Despite these tremendously helpful advancements, the data sets that AI models train on and develop have the potential for misapplication and thereby create concerns for application bias. Subsequently, the mechanisms governing this disruptive innovation must be understood by clinical decision-makers to prevent unnecessary harm. This need will force physicians to change their educational infrastructure to facilitate understanding AI platforms, modeling, and limitations to best acclimate practice in the age of AI. By performing a thorough narrative review, this paper examines these specific AI applications, limitations, and requisites while reviewing a few examples of major data sets that are being cultivated and curated in the US.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedata curationdecision makingdeep learningelectronic health recordmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID34713115
PMCPMC8521931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.