ReviewFrontiers in digital health2021
Accessing Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Decision-Making.
Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07788872 (MORESP, MOre REalistic Spine Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 117 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
MORESP, MOre REalistic Spine Patients: Assessing the Effect of a Predictive Tool ("Dialogue Support") in Relation to Expectations, Post-surgical Outcomes and Surgery Cancellations in Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Spinal Disorders, as Well as Inter-rater Reliability Between Surgeons.
Who cites it
117 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- AI-Based Models for Risk Prediction in MASLD: A Systematic Review.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Integrating aqli (rationale) and naqli (revealed) knowledge in AI-driven clinical decision support systems to enhance healthcare delivery for guiding termination of pregnancy among Muslim patients: a systematic review (1).BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- Detection of parkinson's disease with neuroimaging modalities using machine learning and artificial intelligence: a systematic review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Pooled it
- Systematic review of the use and challenges of electronic health records in physiotherapy practice.BMJ open · 2025Pooled it
- The potentials and challenges of integrating generative artificial intelligence (AI) in dental and orthodontic education: a systematic review.BMC oral health · 2025Pooled it
- Designing Chinese hospital emergency departments to leverage artificial intelligence-a systematic literature review on the challenges and opportunities.Frontiers in medical technology · 2024Pooled it
- Individualized transfusion decisions to minimize adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction and anemia.American heart journal · 2025Trial
- RWD-derived response in multiple myeloma.PloS one · 2023Trial
- Clinician Perceptions of AI in Care: Cross-Sectional Survey.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Veterinary Neurology: Comparative Insights From Human Medicine and Cross-Species Technology Transfer.Veterinary medicine and science · 2026Review
- Ethical and Governance Challenges of AI in Medical Imaging and Diagnostics: A Systematic Survey and Policy Framework Recommendations.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The HALO Model: A Learning Health System Framework for Artificial Intelligence.Learning health systems · 2026Article
- Wearable Sensing for Clinical Physiology Monitoring: Emerging Paradigms.Physiology (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Review
- [Artificial intelligence in surgical disciplines: Clinical application, advantages, and potential-a Delphi expert consensus].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- A Systematic Review of Factors Affecting Utilization of Decision Support Systems: The Interplay Between Technology, Users, and the Healthcare Environment.Health science reports · 2026Review
- AIM: An Advanced Hybrid Inference Model Combining Clinical Rules and Lifelog-Based Learning for Health Risk Prediction.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Machine learning prediction for menopause women with low bone mass: a multicenter and retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The Role of Explanations in AI-Generated Alerts: Qualitative Study of Clinical Views on Explainable AI in Predictive Tools.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Real-Time Evaluation of a Large Language Model for Clinical Practice Guideline Development.Critical care explorations · 2026Article
- Using artificial intelligence to predict sexual health outcomes in endometriosis: a decision tree model algorithm.Sexual medicine · 2026Article
57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advancements in computing and data from the near universal acceptance and implementation of electronic health records has been formative for the growth of personalized, automated, and immediate patient care models that were not previously possible. Artificial intelligence (AI) and its subfields of machine learning, reinforcement learning, and deep learning are well-suited to deal with such data. The authors in this paper review current applications of AI in clinical medicine and discuss the most likely future contributions that AI will provide to the healthcare industry. For instance, in response to the need to risk stratify patients, appropriately cultivated and curated data can assist decision-makers in stratifying preoperative patients into risk categories, as well as categorizing the severity of ailments and health for non-operative patients admitted to hospitals. Previous overt, traditional vital signs and laboratory values that are used to signal alarms for an acutely decompensating patient may be replaced by continuously monitoring and updating AI tools that can pick up early imperceptible patterns predicting subtle health deterioration. Furthermore, AI may help overcome challenges with multiple outcome optimization limitations or sequential decision-making protocols that limit individualized patient care. Despite these tremendously helpful advancements, the data sets that AI models train on and develop have the potential for misapplication and thereby create concerns for application bias. Subsequently, the mechanisms governing this disruptive innovation must be understood by clinical decision-makers to prevent unnecessary harm. This need will force physicians to change their educational infrastructure to facilitate understanding AI platforms, modeling, and limitations to best acclimate practice in the age of AI. By performing a thorough narrative review, this paper examines these specific AI applications, limitations, and requisites while reviewing a few examples of major data sets that are being cultivated and curated in the US.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.