Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34712981›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2021

Injection of Bone Marrow Aspirate for Glenohumeral Joint Osteoarthritis: A Pilot Randomized Control Trial.

Tim Dwyer, Graeme Hoit, Adrienne Lee, Elyse Watkins, Patrick Henry, Tim Leroux, Christian Veillette, John Theodoropoulos, Darrell Ogilvie-Harris, Jaskarndip Chahal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Adipose-derived and bone marrow aspirate concentrate injections for osteoarthritis: A scoping review.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tim DwyerWomen's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Graeme HoitUniversity of Toronto Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Adrienne LeeUniversity of Toronto Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Elyse WatkinsWomen's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Patrick HenrySunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tim LerouxToronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Christian VeilletteToronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
John TheodoropoulosWomen's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Darrell Ogilvie-HarrisToronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jaskarndip ChahalWomen's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University of Toronto · CAMount Sinai Hospital · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the efficacy of a single, intra-articular, nonconcentrated bone marrow aspirate (BMA) injection in comparison to cortisone for the treatment of glenohumeral joint osteoarthritis (GHJ OA).

methodsInclusion criteria were patients between the ages of 18 and 75 with a diagnosis of GHJ OA on radiograph. Patients were randomized to receive an ultrasound-guided, intra-articular cortisone injection or BMA injection (without concentration). The primary outcome measure was the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) index at 12 months. Secondary outcome measures were the QuickDASH, EuroQOL 5-dimensions 5-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) and visual analogue scale.

resultsThe study included 25 shoulders of 22 patients who completed baseline and 12 months' patient-reported outcome measures (12 shoulders received cortisone, 13 shoulders received BMA) after the study was terminated early by changes in Health Canada regulations. Baseline characteristics demonstrated a significant difference in the ages of the 2 groups, with the BMA group being older (61.6 vs 53.8 mean years,

conclusionsThe results of this study demonstrate that patients with GHJ OA treated with BMA have superior changes in the QuickDASH and EQ-5D-5L pain and health scores but not in the WOOS outcomes measures at 12 months post injection when compared to patients treated with cortisone. However, because of the limited number of patients as a result of the early termination of the study, larger randomized studies are required to confirm these findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, randomized controlled trial.

Identifiers

PMID34712981
PMCPMC8527259
OpenAlexW3195422751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.