Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34712936›Full record

ArticleCJC open2021

Effect of Perindopril on Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence and Burden: Results of the Canadian Trial of Atrial Fibrillation (CTAF)-2.

Lena Rivard, Michelle Samuel, Annik Fortier, Marie-Claude Guertin, Paul Khairy, Denis Roy, Mario Talajic, Jean-Claude Tardif

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CJC open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lena RivardResearch Centre, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Michelle SamuelResearch Centre, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Annik FortierMontreal Health Innovations Coordinating Center, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Marie-Claude GuertinMontreal Health Innovations Coordinating Center, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Paul KhairyResearch Centre, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Denis RoyResearch Centre, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Mario TalajicResearch Centre, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Jean-Claude TardifResearch Centre, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Montreal Heart Institute · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypertension is a risk factor for the development and exacerbation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are a standard-of-care treatment option for patients with hypertension; however, there is conflicting evidence about their effects on AF recurrence. Therefore, our objective was to assess the efficacy of perindopril, compared with placebo, to reduce AF recurrence in patients with hypertension and AF.

methodsIn a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients with hypertension and symptomatic AF were randomly assigned (1:1) to perindopril or placebo based on a stratification factor of antiarrhythmic drug use. Patients with terminated AF were followed up from 30 days after randomization to 7 to 13 months. The primary endpoint was AF recurrence. Secondary endpoints included AF hospitalization, cardioversion, and blood pressure control. Recurrent events, AF burden, and safety endpoints were also investigated.

resultsA total of 315 patients were randomly assigned, and 301 patients were included in the modified intent-to-treat analysis (155 vs 146 patients in the perindopril and placebo groups, respectively). The mean follow-up was 336 ± 70 days, and 91.1% of patients were compliant to the treatment medication throughout the study. After adjustment for baseline antiarrhythmic drugs, there was no statistically significant difference in the hazards of AF recurrence (hazard ratio, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.61), with similar blood pressure. The incidence of secondary endpoints and adverse events also did not differ between treatment arms.

conclusionsPerindopril does not reduce recurrence or the number of AF episodes in patients with hypertension and AF.

Identifiers

PMID34712936
PMCPMC8531231
OpenAlexW3159406369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.