ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2021
Weight-for-Height
Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLinear catch-up growth after treatment of severe acute malnutrition (SAM) is low, and little is known about the association between ponderal and subsequent linear growth.
objectiveThe study assessed the association of weight-for-height
methodsThis was a prospective study, nested in a trial (ISRCTN16454889), among 6-59-mo-old children treated for SAM in Uganda. Weight, total length (TL), and knee-heel length (KHL) were measured at admission, weekly during inpatient therapeutic care (ITC), at discharge, and fortnightly during outpatient therapeutic care (OTC) for 8 wk. Linear regression was used to assess the association between WHZ gain during ITC and linear growth during OTC.
resultsOf 400 children, 327 were discharged to OTC and 290 were followed up for 8 wk. Mean WHZ gains were 0.45 in ITC and 1.24 in OTC, whereas mean height-for-age
conclusionsAmong children admitted with SAM, considerable WHZ gain during ITC was followed by very modest linear catch-up growth during OTC, with no indication of a WHZ gain threshold, above which linear growth was higher. To optimize linear growth in these children, early treatment of infections and conditions affecting the gut may be necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.