Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34712795›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2021

Sentiment classification for employees reviews using regression vector- stochastic gradient descent classifier (RV-SGDC).

Babacar Gaye, Dezheng Zhang, Aziguli Wulamu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Babacar GayeSchool of Computer and Communication Engineering, University of Science and Technology, Beijing, China.
Dezheng ZhangSchool of Computer and Communication Engineering, University of Science and Technology, Beijing, China.
Aziguli WulamuSchool of Computer and Communication Engineering, University of Science and Technology, Beijing, China.
University of Science and Technology Beijing · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The satisfaction of employees is very important for any organization to make sufficient progress in production and to achieve its goals. Organizations try to keep their employees satisfied by making their policies according to employees' demands which help to create a good environment for the collective. For this reason, it is beneficial for organizations to perform staff satisfaction surveys to be analyzed, allowing them to gauge the levels of satisfaction among employees. Sentiment analysis is an approach that can assist in this regard as it categorizes sentiments of reviews into positive and negative results. In this study, we perform experiments for the world's big six companies and classify their employees' reviews based on their sentiments. For this, we proposed an approach using lexicon-based and machine learning based techniques. Firstly, we extracted the sentiments of employees from text reviews and labeled the dataset as positive and negative using TextBlob. Then we proposed a hybrid/voting model named Regression Vector-Stochastic Gradient Descent Classifier (RV-SGDC) for sentiment classification. RV-SGDC is a combination of logistic regression, support vector machines, and stochastic gradient descent. We combined these models under a majority voting criteria. We also used other machine learning models in the performance comparison of RV-SGDC. Further, three feature extraction techniques: term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF), bag of words, and global vectors are used to train learning models. We evaluated the performance of all models in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. The results revealed that RV-SGDC outperforms with a 0.97 accuracy score using the TF-IDF feature due to its hybrid architecture.

Indexed as

Employees classificationHybrid modelMachine learningSentiment analysisText classification

Identifiers

PMID34712795
PMCPMC8507482
OpenAlexW3201213805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.