ArticleCureus2021
Histopathological Examination of the Mucosal Effects of Obstetric Gel on Vaginal Wound Healing in an Incision-Inflicted Rat Model.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective The present study intended to investigate the histopathological efficacy of obstetric gels on the healing of vaginal lacerations in rats. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first such study. Materials and methods Twenty-one female Wistar albino rats were divided into three groups, comprising seven animals per group. The first group (group 1) was the control group, the second (group 2) was the polyvinyl iodine (PI) group, and the third group (group 3) was the obstetric gel (OG) group. In all three groups, a vaginal incision was made with a No. 10 scalpel, and the incision site was sutured with a 3-0 Vicryl suture. In the control group, the incision site was left for routine healing. The incision site was washed with PI in the PI group and with OG in the OG group. After 15 days, vaginal tissues were obtained from all three groups for histopathological examination. In addition, immunohistochemistry staining was performed using caspase 3 and fibrillin 1 antibodies. Results There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of congestion, vascular proliferation, and inflammation stages in the examinations performed on the vaginal wall. However, the amount of collagen and elastic fibers increased during the remodeling and fibrosis phase, and the fibrillin 1 score increased in immunohistochemistry staining (p < 0.001). Conclusion It has been shown in rat vaginal tissue that obstetric gels do not have negative effects on wound healing; however, they contribute to wound healing by positively affecting the fibrosis stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.