Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34712486›Full record

ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2021

Rectal cancer treatment and outcomes in elderly patients treated with curative intent.

Sharlyn Kang, Kate J Wilkinson, Daniel Brungs, Wei Chua, Weng Ng, James Chen, Elias Nasser, Mark Lee, Karen Wong, Les Bokey and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Sharlyn KangIllawarra Cancer Care Centre, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2500, Australia.
Kate J WilkinsonWestern Sydney University, Campbelltown, New South Wales 2560, Australia.
Daniel BrungsIllawarra Cancer Care Centre, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2500, Australia.
Wei ChuaWestern Sydney University, Campbelltown, New South Wales 2560, Australia.
Weng NgWestern Sydney University, Campbelltown, New South Wales 2560, Australia.
James ChenIllawarra Cancer Care Centre, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2500, Australia.
Elias NasserIllawarra Cancer Care Centre, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2500, Australia.
Mark LeeLiverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool, New South Wales 2170, Australia.
Karen WongLiverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool, New South Wales 2170, Australia.
Les BokeyWestern Sydney University, Campbelltown, New South Wales 2560, Australia.
Robert WinnColorectal Unit, Division of Surgery, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, New South Wales 2500, Australia.
Soni PutnisColorectal Unit, Division of Surgery, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, New South Wales 2500, Australia.
Cheok Soon LeeWestern Sydney University, Campbelltown, New South Wales 2560, Australia.
Stephanie Hui-Su LimWestern Sydney University, Campbelltown, New South Wales 2560, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The elderly population comprises a significant proportion of patients diagnosed with rectal cancer. However, there is a lack of evidence to guide treatment decisions in this group. Thus, this multicentre study compares the histopathology, treatment patterns and outcomes between the elderly and young populations with non-metastatic rectal cancer. The present study reported on the clinicopathological variables, treatment modalities and survival outcomes in 736 patients diagnosed with non-metastatic rectal cancer between 2006 and 2015. Patients were divided into the following two groups, <70 and ≥70 years of age, which were compared using Chi-square and survival outcome analysis using Kaplan-Meier. Elderly patients made up nearly half of the cohort and were less likely to undergo trimodality therapy or be discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting. Surgery in the elderly patients was associated with increased mortality. Elderly patients had worse cancer-specific survival (75 vs. 85%), which was particularly evident in stage III disease (hazard ratio, 2.1). Elderly patients in this subgroup treated with trimodality therapy had similar survival outcomes to younger patients. Elderly patients with locally advanced rectal cancer comprise a large proportion of the patient cohort. Consideration should be given for trimodality therapy in this group, taking into account biological age, especially in the context of increasing life expectancy and improvement in the management of age-related comorbidities.

Indexed as

chemoradiationelderly patientsgeriatric oncologyoutcomesrectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID34712486
PMCPMC8548997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.