Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34712485›Full record

ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2021

Urine TERT promoter mutations-based tumor DNA detection in patients with bladder cancer: A pilot study.

Mark Jain, David Kamalov, Alexander Tivtikyan, Alexander Balatsky, Larisa Samokhodskaya, Dmitry Okhobotov, Polina Kozlova, Eduard Pisarev, Maria Zvereva, Armais Kamalov

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark JainMedical Research and Educational Center, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119992 Moscow, Russia.
David KamalovMedical Research and Educational Center, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119992 Moscow, Russia.
Alexander TivtikyanMedical Research and Educational Center, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119992 Moscow, Russia.
Alexander BalatskyMedical Research and Educational Center, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119992 Moscow, Russia.
Larisa SamokhodskayaMedical Research and Educational Center, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119992 Moscow, Russia.
Dmitry OkhobotovMedical Research and Educational Center, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119992 Moscow, Russia.
Polina KozlovaDepartment of Fundamental Medicine, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Eduard PisarevDepartment of Bioinformatics and Bioengineering, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Maria ZverevaDepartment of Chemistry, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Armais KamalovMedical Research and Educational Center, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119992 Moscow, Russia.
Lomonosov Moscow State University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutations are the most frequent genetic events in bladder cancer (BC). The aim of the present pilot study was to evaluate the diagnostic potential of urine TERT promoter mutations-based liquid biopsy in patients with an ongoing oncological process, as well as in post-resection patients at risk of BC recurrence. A total of 60 patients were enrolled, of whom 27 patients had histologically proven BC; 23 had no signs of BC (control group); and 10 patients underwent transurethral malignancy resection 3-6 months prior to urine donation ('second look' group). Urine TERT promoter mutations were detected using Droplet Digital PCR. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed significant diagnostic power of the present approach (area under the curve: -0.768). At the cut-off value of tumor DNA fraction 0.34%, the sensitivity and specificity were 55.56 and 100%, respectively. In the positive samples, tumor DNA fraction varied significantly from 0.59 to 48.77%. In the 'second look' group, tumor DNA was detected in 4/10 patients, highlighting the possibility of BC recurrence with its fraction ranging only from 0.90 to 6.61%. Therefore, urine TERT promoter mutations-based liquid biopsy appears to be a promising tool for BC diagnosis and surveillance. The main study will include recruitment of additional patients, extension of the mutation panel, prolonged follow-up of the post-resection patients, as well as screening of industrial workers exposed to specific carcinogens.

Indexed as

bladder cancercancer biomarkerscancer relapsedigital droplet polymerase chain reactiontelomerase reverse transcriptaseurine liquid biopsy

Identifiers

PMID34712485
PMCPMC8548999
OpenAlexW3206157682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.