Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34712464›Full record

ArticleFrontline gastroenterology2021

Gastrointestinal consequences of cancer treatment: evaluation of 10 years' experience at a tertiary UK centre.

Radha Gadhok, Emma Paulon, Chehkuan Tai, Tomisin Olushola, John Barragry, Farooq Rahman, Simona Di Caro, Shameer Mehta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontline gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Radha GadhokDepartment of Gastrointestinal Services, University College London Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0421-3153
Emma PaulonDepartment of Gastrointestinal Services, University College London Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Chehkuan TaiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Services, University College London Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Tomisin OlusholaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Services, University College London Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
John BarragryDepartment of Gastrointestinal Services, University College London Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Farooq RahmanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Services, University College London Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Simona Di CaroDepartment of Gastrointestinal Services, University College London Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Shameer MehtaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Services, University College London Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveUp to 90% of patients treated for pelvic cancers experience chronic gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. This study characterises this patient cohort at a single centre, addressing a paucity of publications reporting 'real-world' experiences.

methodOutpatient referrals, from oncology to the gastroenterology and nutrition services, at a tertiary London hospital from 2006 to 2016, were retrospectively identified. Patient characteristics, reported symptoms, investigations, diagnoses, response to therapeutics and follow-up were recorded.

resultsOf 269 patients referred, 81% were within the latter 5 years. A total of 260 patients had diagnoses of pelvic cancers (prostatic (52%), cervical (19%) and endometrial (19%)). Among 247 treated with radiotherapy, the median time from radiotherapy to symptom onset was 8 months. Common symptoms were rectal bleeding (51%), diarrhoea (32%), faecal urgency (19%) and pain (19%). Patients underwent a median of three investigations including lower GI endoscopy (86%), thyroid function tests (33%) and glucose hydrogen breath test (30%). Diagnoses included radiation proctopathy (39%), colonic polyps (16%), pelvic floor dysfunction (12%), bile acid malabsorption (BAM) (8%), small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) (8%), vitamin D deficiency (7%) and iron deficiency (7%). Among 164 discharged patients, the time to discharge was 7 months, after a median of two appointments.

conclusionsThis unique patient group reports a complex mix of symptoms and requires specialist review and consideration of often uninvestigated diagnoses (pelvic dysfunction, BAM, SIBO and nutritional deficiencies). Such patients are often overlooked, compared with those suffering many other chronic GI disorders. Further reports from non-dedicated centres treating patients with pelvic radiation disease will aid in understanding of secondary GI diagnoses and variation in practice.

Indexed as

cancerenteropathyradiation enteritis

Identifiers

PMID34712464
PMCPMC8515283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.