Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34712256›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2021

Chickpea (

Amod Madurapperumage, Leung Tang, Pushparajah Thavarajah, William Bridges, Emerson Shipe, George Vandemark, Dil Thavarajah

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Chickpea (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Resistance ofHeliyon · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Ascochyta Blight in Chickpea: An Update.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  15. Biofilm formation and flocculation potential analysis of halotolerantPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amod MadurapperumagePlant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States.
Leung TangAgilent Technologies, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Pushparajah ThavarajahPlant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States.
William BridgesPlant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States.
Emerson ShipePlant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States.
George VandemarkGrain Legume Genetics and Physiology Research Unit, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States.
Dil ThavarajahPlant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chickpea is a highly nutritious pulse crop with low digestible carbohydrates (40-60%), protein (15-22%), essential fats (4-8%), and a range of minerals and vitamins. The fatty acid composition of the seed adds value because fats govern the texture, shelf-life, flavor, aroma, and nutritional composition of chickpea-based food products. Therefore, the biofortification of essential fatty acids has become a nutritional breeding target for chickpea crop improvement programs worldwide. This paper examines global chickpea production, focusing on plant lipids, their functions, and their benefits to human health. In addition, this paper also reviews the chemical analysis of essential fatty acids and possible breeding targets to enrich essential fatty acids in chickpea (

Indexed as

biofortificationchickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)essential fatty acidsfourier transform infrared spectroscopynutritional breeding

Identifiers

PMID34712256
PMCPMC8545914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.