Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34712230›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2021

Effect of Immune Checkpoint Blockade on Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cell Populations in Patients With Melanoma.

Steven H Sun, Brooke Benner, Himanshu Savardekar, Gabriella Lapurga, Logan Good, David Abood, Erin Nagle, Megan Duggan, Andrew Stiff, Mallory J DiVincenzo and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The new world of RNA diagnostics and therapeutics.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Steven H SunDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Brooke BennerComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Himanshu SavardekarComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Gabriella LapurgaComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Logan GoodComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
David AboodComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Erin NagleComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Megan DugganComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Andrew StiffComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Mallory J DiVincenzoComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Lorena P Suarez-KellyComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Amanda CampbellComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Lianbo YuCenter for Biostatistics, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Robert WesolowskiComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Harrison HowardComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Hiral ShahComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Kari KendraComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
William E CarsonDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
The Ohio State University · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · US

Funding

UM1 Supplement for Early Therapeutic Trials with Phase 2 IntentUM1CA186712 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SUSANNE M ARNOLD, WILLIAM E. CARSON · 2014 to 2026
$19.3M
Advanced Research Training in Immunology for Surgery Trainees (ARTIST)T32AI106704 · NIAID · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GINNY L BUMGARDNER, Jon R Wisler · 2014 to 2026
$3.5M
Novel Cilia Trafficking MechanismsR01DK084725 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MARGOLIS, BENJAMIN L · 2009 to 2010
$702k
NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186712NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI106704NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK084725
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) are a subset of immature myeloid cells that inhibit anti-tumor immunity and contribute to immune therapy resistance. MDSC populations were measured in melanoma patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Methods: Patients with melanoma (n=128) provided blood samples at baseline (BL), and before cycles 2 and 3 (BC2, BC3). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were analyzed for MDSC (CD33 Results: Levels of MDSC as a percentage of PBMC increased during ICI (BL: 9.2 ± 1.0% to BC3: 23.6 ± 1.9%, p<0.0001), and patients who developed progressive disease (PD) had higher baseline MDSC. In patients who had a complete or partial response (CR, PR), total MDSC levels rose dramatically and plateaued (BL: 6.4 ± 1.4%, BC2: 26.2 ± 4.2%, BC3: 27.5 ± 4.4%; p<0.0001), whereas MDSC rose less sharply in PD patients (BL: 11.7 ± 2.1%, BC2: 18.3 ± 3.1%, BC3: 19.0 ± 3.2%; p=0.1952). Subset analysis showed that within the expanding MDSC population, PMN-MDSC and E-MDSC levels decreased, while the proportion of M-MDSC remained constant during ICI. In PD patients, the proportion of PMN-MDSC (as a percentage of total MDSC) decreased (BL: 25.1 ± 4.7%, BC2: 16.1 ± 5.2%, BC3: 8.6 ± 1.8%; p=0.0105), whereas a heretofore under-characterized CD14+/CD15+ double positive MDSC subpopulation increased significantly (BL: 8.7 ± 1.4% to BC3: 26.9 ± 4.9%; p=0.0425). Conclusions: MDSC levels initially increased significantly in responders. PMN-MDSC decreased and CD14+CD15+ MDSC increased significantly in PD patients. Changes in MDSC levels may have prognostic value in ICI.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCell CountFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsIpilimumabMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedMyeloid-Derived Suppressor CellsNivolumabProspective StudiesSkin NeoplasmsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsIpilimumabNivolumabpembrolizumabgranulocytic MDSCimmune checkpoint blockadeMDSCmelanomamonocytic MDSCnivolumabpembrolizumab

Identifiers

PMID34712230
PMCPMC8547308
OpenAlexW3206119900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.