Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34712034›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of gastroenterology2021

Determination of gluten immunogenic peptides for the management of the treatment adherence of celiac disease: A systematic review.

Laura Coto, Irati Mendia, Carolina Sousa, Julio César Bai, Angel Cebolla

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Effect ofWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2024
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Beyond gluten-free diet: Novel therapeutic frontiers in celiac disease armamentarium.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Use of technology to educate patients with celiac disease.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Celiac Disease in Children: A 2023 Update.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura CotoResearch and Development, Biomedal, Camas 41900, Seville, Spain.
Irati MendiaResearch and Development, Biomedal, Camas 41900, Seville, Spain.
Carolina SousaDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, University of Seville, Seville 41013, Spain.
Julio César BaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dr. Carlos Bonorino Udaondo Gastroenterology Hospital, Buenos Aires 1264, Argentina. jbai@intramed.net.
Angel CebollaResearch and Development, Biomedal, Camas 41900, Seville, Spain.
Biomedal (Spain) · ESInstituto de Gastroenterología · CUUniversidad de Sevilla · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGluten is a complex mixture of proteins with immunogenic peptide sequences triggering the autoimmune activity in patients with celiac disease (CeD). Gluten immunogenic peptides (GIP) are resistant to gastrointestinal digestion and are then excreted

aimTo summarize published literature about the clinical utility of GIP determination in comparison to the tools employed for GFD monitoring.

methodsPubMed and Web of Science searches were performed using the keywords "gluten immunogenic peptides" or "gluten immunogenic peptide" and a combination of the previous terms with "feces", "stools", "urine", "celiac disease", "gluten-free diet", and "adherence" to identify relevant clinical studies published in English and Spanish between 2012 to January 2021. Reference lists from the articles were reviewed to identify additional pertinent articles. Published articles and abstracts reporting the clinical use of GIP determination in stool and/or urine for the follow-up of patients with CeD in comparison with other tools in use were included. Case reports, commentaries, reviews, conference papers, letters, and publications that did not focus on the aims of this review were excluded.

resultsTotal of 15 publications were found that involved the use of GIP determination in stool and/or urine to monitor the adherence to the GFD in comparison to other tools. Studies included both children and adults diagnosed with CeD and healthy volunteers. Overall, these preliminary studies indicated that this novel technique was highly sensitive for the detection of GFD transgressions and therefore could facilitate the follow-up of patients with CeD. Tools identified in this work included the CeD-specific serology, dietetic questionnaires, symptomatology, and the duodenal biopsy. Review of the literature revealed that the rates of GFD adherence may vary between 30%-93% using either stool or urine GIP determination, 49%-96% by the serology, 59%-94% using the dietetic questionnaires, 56%-95% by the reported symptoms and 44%-76% with the duodenal biopsy. In addition, the association between the different methods and histological abnormalities (Marsh II-III) was found to be 33%-100% for GIP determination (stool and urine), 25%-39% for CeD-specific serology, 3%-50% for dietetic questionnaires, and 22%-28% for the symptomatology.

conclusionExcreted GIP detection is the precise approach for determining voluntary or involuntary gluten consumption in CeD patients preventing future complications arising from gluten exposure.

Indexed as

Celiac DiseaseGlutensAdultChildDiet, Gluten-FreeHumansPatient CompliancePeptidesGlutensPeptidesCeliac diseaseGluten-free dietGluten immunogenic peptidesImmunoassaysStoolUrine

Identifiers

PMID34712034
PMCPMC8515793
OpenAlexW3202591110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.