Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34711947›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2022

Efficacy of first-line atezolizumab combination therapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving proton pump inhibitors: post hoc analysis of IMpower150.

Ashley M Hopkins, Ganessan Kichenadasse, Ross A McKinnon, Ahmad Y Abuhelwa, Jessica M Logan, Sarah Badaoui, Christos S Karapetis, Andrew Rowland, Michael J Sorich

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ashley M HopkinsCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia. ashley.hopkins@flinders.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7652-4378
Ganessan KichenadasseCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9923-5149
Ross A McKinnonCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Ahmad Y AbuhelwaCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Jessica M LoganCancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Sarah BadaouiCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Christos S KarapetisCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1741-996X
Andrew RowlandCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Michael J SorichCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1999-866X
Flinders University · AUUniversity of South Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly used concomitant to cancer treatment and they induce gut microbiota changes. It is increasingly apparent that gut dysbiosis can reduce the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). However, little is known about PPI effects on outcomes with ICIs, particularly in combination, ICI approaches.

methodsPost hoc, Cox proportional hazard analysis of phase III trial, IMpower150 was conducted to assess the association between PPI use and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in chemotherapy-naive, metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer participants randomised atezolizumab plus carboplatin plus paclitaxel (ACP), bevacizumab plus carboplatin plus paclitaxel (BCP), or atezolizumab plus BCP (ABCP). PPI use was defined as any PPI administration between 30 days prior and 30 days after treatment initiation.

resultsOf 1202 participants, 441 (37%) received a PPI. PPI use was independently associated with worse OS (n = 748; hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 1.53 [1.21-1.95], P < 0.001) and PFS (1.34 [1.12-1.61], P = 0.002) in the pooled atezolizumab arms (ACP plus ABCP). This association was not apparent for BCP (n = 368; OS 1.01 [0.73-1.39], P = 0.969; PFS 0.97 [0.76-1.25], P = 0.827). The observed OS treatment effect (HR 95% CI) of the atezolizumab (ACP plus ABCP) arms vs BCP was 1.03 (0.77-1.36) for PPI users compared to 0.68 (0.54-0.86) for non-users (P [interaction] = 0.028). A similar association was noted for ABCP vs BCP (PPI users 0.96 [0.68-1.35]; PPI non-users 0.66 [0.50-0.87]; P [interaction] = 0.095).

conclusionsPPI use was a negative prognostic marker in patients treated with ACP or ABCP, but not BCP. The analysis suggests that PPIs negatively influence the magnitude of ICI efficacy.

Indexed as

AgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabCarboplatinCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPaclitaxelProton Pump InhibitorsSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedatezolizumabBevacizumabCarboplatinImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsPaclitaxelProton Pump Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID34711947
PMCPMC8727569
OpenAlexW3209720852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.