Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34711944›Full record

SynthesisPediatric research2022

Umbilical cord blood culture in neonatal early-onset sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Thomas H Dierikx, Anton H L C van Kaam, Tim G J de Meij, Ralph de Vries, Wes Onland, Douwe H Visser

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pediatric research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Group BAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas H DierikxDepartment of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Emma Children's Hospital, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. t.dierikx@amsterdamumc.nl.
Anton H L C van KaamNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Emma Children's Hospital, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tim G J de MeijDepartment of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Emma Children's Hospital, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ralph de VriesMedical Library, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wes OnlandNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Emma Children's Hospital, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Douwe H VisserNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Emma Children's Hospital, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLEmma Kinderziekenhuis · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeripheral blood culture (PBC) is considered the gold standard for diagnosis of neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS), but its diagnostic value can be questioned. We aimed to systematically asses the diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) of umbilical cord blood culture (UCBC) for EOS.

methodsA systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Studies performing UCBC for the diagnosis of EOS were included.

resultsA total of 1908 articles were screened of which 17 were included. Incidences of positive PBC and UCBC were low in all studies. There was a large heterogeneity in the consistency between positive PBC and UCBC outcomes. PBC had a pooled sensitivity of 20.4% (95% CI 0.0-40.9) and specificity of 100.0% (95% CI 100.0-100.0) compared to 42.6% (95% CI 12.7-72.4%) and 97.8% (95% CI 93.1-100.0) of UCBC for clinical EOS, defined as clinical sepsis regardless of PBC outcomes.

conclusionsThis systematic review shows that, compared to PBC, UCBC has higher sensitivity and comparable specificity for clinical EOS and might be considered as diagnostic test for EOS. Due to the limited number of studies, low incidences of EOS cases, and the imperfect reference standards for EOS, results should be interpreted cautiously. IMPACT: This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the diagnostic test accuracy of umbilical cord blood culture for neonatal early-onset sepsis. Peripheral blood culture is considered the gold standard for diagnosis of neonatal early-onset sepsis, but its value for this specific diagnosis can be questioned. Umbilical cord blood culture has higher sensitivity and comparable specificity for diagnosis of neonatal early-onset sepsis compared to peripheral blood culture, circumventing the risk for iatrogenic anemia and consequently might be used as a diagnostic tool for early-onset sepsis. Quality of evidence was regarded as low due to imperfect diagnostic methods of neonatal early-onset sepsis.

Indexed as

Neonatal SepsisSepsisBiomarkersBlood CultureFetal BloodHumansInfant, NewbornBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID34711944
OpenAlexW3209811316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.