ArticleThe American journal of case reports2021
A Pain in the Foot: Delayed Diagnosis of Primary Septic Arthritis of Naviculocuneiform and Second/Third Tarsometatarsal Joints.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Septic arthritis needs to be recognized early because a delay in the treatment leads to significant morbidity and mortality. We present a case of primary septic arthritis of the tarsometatarsal joints in a middle-aged man who presented multiple times to outpatient clinics and the Emergency Department with worsening foot pain. His condition was misdiagnosed several times, and he only received definitive treatment 3 weeks after the onset of his symptoms. CASE REPORT A middle-aged man developed sudden-onset atraumatic left ankle pain that later localized to his foot. Despite analgesics, his foot pain became severe and persistent, affecting his ambulation and sleep. He had multiple consults with his primary care physician, orthopedic specialists, and emergency physicians. Initial radiological and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed degenerative changes, and osteoarthritis was diagnosed. Despite regular analgesics, he experienced worsening pain, prompting his revisit to the Emergency Department. Upon admission, his inflammatory markers were more elevated and a repeat MRI of the foot showed extensive joint effusion, periarticular marrow edema, and bony erosions. He underwent second to third tarsometatarsal joint debridement, washout, drainage, and biopsy. Intraoperative findings showed purulent fluid and clumps of debris within the joint. He received a 6-week course of intravenous antibiotics and was transferred to a rehabilitation center. CONCLUSIONS Septic arthritis of the midfoot is rare. Laboratory and radiological investigations have limitations and should be guided by appropriate clinical findings and judgment. It is important to maintain a high index of suspicion for these cases to prevent morbidity in affected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.