Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34711585›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2021

Novel two-tiered developmental screening programme for Singaporean toddlers: a quality improvement report.

Nwe Nwe Linn Oo, David Chee Chin Ng, Truls Ostbye, John Carson Allen, Pratibha Keshav Agarwal, Sita Padmini Yeleswarapu, Shu-Ling Chong, Xiaoxuan Guo, Yoke Hwee Chan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nwe Nwe Linn OoDuke-NUS Medical School, Singapore nwenwelinn.oo@mohh.com.sg.ORCID 0000-0003-4543-0170
David Chee Chin NgSingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore.
Truls OstbyeDuke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
John Carson AllenDuke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Pratibha Keshav AgarwalKK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.
Sita Padmini YeleswarapuKK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.
Shu-Ling ChongKK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.
Xiaoxuan GuoSingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore.
Yoke Hwee ChanKK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.
KK Women's and Children's Hospital · SGDuke-NUS Medical School · SGSingHealth Polyclinics · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early identification of developmental delays with timely intervention, especially before the age of 3 years, can improve child development. In Singapore, however, diagnosis and intervention for developmental delays occur at a median age of 44 months. As early detection and intervention depends on an effective developmental screening programme, we aimed to improve the detection of developmental delays before the age of 3 years in a primary care setting. We did this by implementing a novel two-tiered screening programme which uses three standardised screening tools (Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status, PEDS-Developmental Milestones and Ages and Stages Questionnaire-3). We used quality improvement methods to integrate and optimise this two-tiered programme into the existing 9-month and 18-month screening schedule, with an additional screening at 30 months to replace the pre-existing 36-month screening of the National Child Health Surveillance Programme. A total of three Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles were performed to ensure programme feasibility and sustainability. They focused on adequately training the primary care nurses, targeting an 80% screening rate and aiming for 20 min screening tool administration time per child. We assessed the proportion of children referred to the child development units after positive screening for developmental concerns under the new programme, with a pre-post and with-without intervention comparison, and reviewed the screening rates and screening tool administration time. The proportion of 18-month old children referred for developmental concerns improved from 3.5%-7.1% over a 6-month period. For those who received further assessment by developmental specialists after the two-tiered screening, 100% received a definitive diagnosis of developmental delays, similar to the situation before programme introduction. Our quality improvement efforts facilitated successful integration of the two-tiered programme into the pre-existing screening schedule with minimal impact to the clinic workflow. While we highlight challenges in implementation that need to be addressed, our findings support a potential nationwide adoption of the two-tiered programme.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningQuality ImprovementChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolHumansInfantParentsSurveys and Questionnairespaediatricsprimary carequality improvement

Identifiers

PMID34711585
PMCPMC8557273
OpenAlexW3210814708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.