NICE guideline NG193 for chronic pain: reasons to be cheerful.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Burn patients' perceptions of skin grafting in China: a single-center retrospective cohort study with paired pre-post assessment.Frontiers in public health · 2026
   Article
2. Rethinking pain: a paradigm shift in primary care for chronic pain via community-based, culturally-responsive GP support.Pain management · 2025
   Article
3. 'What script am I meant to use?': a qualitative study in chronic primary pain.BJGP open · 2024
   Article
4. NICE chronic primary pain guidelines: what the busy GP needs to know.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as