Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34711477›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur medizinische Physik2022

Volumetric

Michaela A U Hoesl, Lothar R Schad, Stanislas Rapacchi

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Triple-PulseMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michaela A U HoeslComputer Assisted Clinical Medicine, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany. Electronic address: michaela.hoesl@gmail.de.
Lothar R SchadComputer Assisted Clinical Medicine, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.
Stanislas RapacchiAix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, CRMBM, Marseille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo measure multi-quantum coherence (MQC)

methodsThe 3D Cartesian single and triple-quantum imaging of

resultsAt 7T, the 3D-CRISTINA acquisition allowed to reduce the TR to 230ms from the previous 390ms for 2D, resulting in a total acquisition time of 53min for a 3D volume of 4×4×8mm resolution. The phase cycle evaluation showed that the 7T acquisition time could be reduced by 4-fold with moderate single and triple-quantum signals SNR loss. The healthy volunteers demonstrated clinical feasibility at 7T and showed a difference in the MQC signals ratio of White Matter (WM) and Grey Matter (GM).

conclusionVolumetric CRISTINA multi-quantum imaging allowed whole-brain coverage. The non-selective excitation enabled a faster scan due to a decrease in energy deposition which enabled a lower repetition time. Thus, it should be the preferred choice for future in vivo multi-quantum applications compared to the 2D method. A more extensive study is warranted to explore WM and GM MQC differences.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingSodiumBrainHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalPhantoms, ImagingSepharoseSignal-To-Noise RatioSepharoseSodiumSodium MRISodium triple-quantum imagingWhole-brain imaging

Identifiers

PMID34711477
PMCPMC9948835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.