Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34711444›Full record

ReviewHealth policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2022

Early health system responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Mediterranean countries: A tale of successes and challenges.

Ruth Waitzberg, Cristina Hernández-Quevedo, Enrique Bernal-Delgado, Francisco Estupiñán-Romero, Ester Angulo-Pueyo, Mamas Theodorou, Marios Kantaris, Chrystala Charalambous, Elena Gabriel, Charalampos Economou and 14 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Ruth WaitzbergThe Smokler Center for Health Policy Research, Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute, Israel; Department of Health Care Management, Faculty of Economics & Management, Technical University Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: ruthw@jdc.org.
Cristina Hernández-QuevedoEuropean Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Spain.
Enrique Bernal-DelgadoData Sciences for Health Services and Policy Research. Institute for Health Sciences in Aragon (IACS), Spain.
Francisco Estupiñán-RomeroData Sciences for Health Services and Policy Research. Institute for Health Sciences in Aragon (IACS), Spain.
Ester Angulo-PueyoData Sciences for Health Services and Policy Research. Institute for Health Sciences in Aragon (IACS), Spain.
Mamas TheodorouOpen University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Marios KantarisAmerican University of Cyprus, Larnaca, Health Services Research Centre.
Chrystala CharalambousEuropean University, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Elena GabrielMinistry of Health, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Charalampos EconomouDepartment of Sociology, Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences, Athens, Greece.
Daphne KaitelidouCenter for Health Services Management and Evaluation, Department of Nursing, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.
Olympia KonstantakopoulouCenter for Health Services Management and Evaluation, Department of Nursing, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.
Lilian Venetia VildiridiLSE - LSHTM, Advisor to the Deputy Minister of Health, Athens, Greece.
Amit MeshulamThe Smokler Center for Health Policy Research, Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute, Israel.
Antonio Giulio de BelvisDepartment of Life and Public Health Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy; Critical Pathways and Outcomes Evaluation Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Alisha MorsellaDepartment of Life and Public Health Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy; Critical Pathways and Outcomes Evaluation Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Alexia BezzinaCOVID-19 Public Health Response Team Malta.
Karen VincentiCOVID-19 Public Health Response Team Malta.
Gonçalo Figueiredo AugustoNOVA National School of Public Health, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa; Comprehensive Health Research Center, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa; Global Health and Tropical Medicine, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa.
Inês FronteiraGlobal Health and Tropical Medicine, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa.
Jorge SimõesGlobal Health and Tropical Medicine, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa.
Marina KaranikolosEuropean Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Spain.
Gemma WilliamsEuropean Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Spain.
Anna MaressoEuropean Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper conducts a comparative review of the (curative) health systems' response taken by Cyprus, Greece, Israel, Italy, Malta, Portugal, and Spain during the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, these Mediterranean countries shared similarities in terms of health system resources, which were low compared to the EU/OECD average. We distill key policy insights regarding the governance tools adopted to manage the pandemic, the means to secure sufficient physical infrastructure and workforce capacity and some financing and coverage aspects. We performed a qualitative analysis of the evidence reported to the 'Health System Response Monitor' platform of the European Observatory by country experts. We found that governance in the early stages of the pandemic was undertaken centrally in all the Mediterranean countries, even in Italy and Spain where regional authorities usually have autonomy over health matters. Stretched public resources prompted countries to deploy "flexible" intensive care unit capacity and health workforce resources as agile solutions. The private sector was also utilized to expand resources and health workforce capacity, through special public-private partnerships. Countries ensured universal coverage for COVID-19-related services, even for groups not usually entitled to free publicly financed health care, such as undocumented migrants. We conclude that flexibility, speed and adaptive management in health policy responses were key to responding to immediate needs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Financial barriers to accessing care as well as potentially higher mortality rates were avoided in most of the countries during the first wave. Yet it is still early to assess to what extent countries were able to maintain essential services without undermining equitable access to high quality care.

Indexed as

COVID-19Delivery of Health CareHumansPandemicsPrivate SectorUniversal Health InsuranceCOVID-19governancehealth system responsesMediterranean countries

Identifiers

PMID34711444
PMCPMC8507573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.