Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34711266›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2021

Feasibility study to assess the delivery of a novel isometric exercise intervention for people with stage 1 hypertension in the NHS: protocol for the IsoFIT-BP study including amendments to mitigate the risk of COVID-19.

Jonathan Wiles, Melanie Rees-Roberts, Jamie M O'Driscoll, Timothy Doulton, Douglas MacInnes, Vanessa Short, Tracy Pellatt-Higgins, Katie Saxby, Katerina Gousia, Alan West and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07297485 (An Observational Cross-Sectional Comparison to Evaluate the Level of Agreement Between Standard Universal Goniometer Measurements and a Squat Height Calculator Algorithm to Determine Squat Position for Isometric Wall Squat Position.), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07297485 completednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

An Observational Cross-Sectional Comparison to Evaluate the Level of Agreement Between Standard Universal Goniometer Measurements and a Squat Height Calculator Algorithm to Determine Squat Position for Isometric Wall Squat Position.

TypeobservationalSponsorNorthumbria UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled21ConditionsWall Squat Position
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jonathan WilesFaculty of Science, Engineering and Social Sciences, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, Kent, UK. jim.wiles@canterbury.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7790-8063
Melanie Rees-RobertsCentre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, UK.
Jamie M O'DriscollFaculty of Science, Engineering and Social Sciences, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, Kent, UK.
Timothy DoultonRenal Department East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury, Kent, UK.
Douglas MacInnesFaculty of Medicine, Health and Social Care, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, Kent, UK.
Vanessa ShortCentre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, UK.
Tracy Pellatt-HigginsCentre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, UK.
Katie SaxbyCentre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, UK.
Katerina GousiaCentre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, UK.
Alan West, Kent, UK.
Maggie Smith, Kent, UK.
Ellie SanterFaculty of Science, Engineering and Social Sciences, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, Kent, UK.
John Darby, Kent, UK.
Chris K FarmerCentre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, UK.
University of Kent · GBCanterbury Christ Church University · GBKent State University · USEast Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypertension  (HTN) affects approximately 25% of the UK population and is a leading cause of mortality. Associated annual health care costs run into billions. National treatment guidance includes initial lifestyle advice, followed by anti-hypertensive medication if blood pressure (BP) remains high. However, adoption and adherence to recommended exercise guidelines, dietary advice and anti-hypertensive medication is poor. Four short bouts of isometric exercise (IE) performed 3 days per week (d/wk) at home elicits clinically significant reductions in BP in those with normal to high-normal BP. This study will determine the feasibility of delivering personalised IE to patients with stage 1 hypertension for whom lifestyle changes would be recommended before medication within NHS primary care.

methodsThis is a randomised controlled feasibility study. Participants were 18+ years, with stage 1 hypertension, not on anti-hypertensive medication and without significant medical contraindications. Trial arms will be standard lifestyle advice (control) or isometric wall squat exercise and standard lifestyle advice. Primary outcomes include the feasibility of healthcare professionals to deliver isometric exercise prescriptions in a primary care NHS setting and estimation of the variance of change in systolic BP. Secondary outcomes include accuracy of protocol delivery, execution of and adherence to protocol, recruitment rate, attrition, perception of intervention viability, cost, participant experience and accuracy of home BP. The study will last 18 months. Sample size of 100 participants (50 per arm) allows for 20% attrition and 6.5% incomplete data, based upon 74 (37 each arm) participants (two-sided 95% confidence interval, width of 1.33 and standard deviation of 4) completing 4 weeks. Ethical approval IRAS ID is 274676. DISCUSSION: Before the efficacy of this novel intervention to treat stage 1 hypertension can be investigated in any large randomised controlled trial, it is necessary to ascertain if it can be delivered and carried out in a NHS primary care setting. Findings could support IE viability as a prophylactic/alternative treatment option.

trial registrationISRCTN13472393 , registered 18 August 2020.

Indexed as

COVID-19ExerciseFeasibility studyGeneral practiceHypertensionIsometric exercise

Identifiers

PMID34711266
PMCPMC8551940
OpenAlexW3122965699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.