Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34711223›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2021

Plastid phylogenomic insights into relationships of all flowering plant families.

Hong-Tao Li, Yang Luo, Lu Gan, Peng-Fei Ma, Lian-Ming Gao, Jun-Bo Yang, Jie Cai, Matthew A Gitzendanner, Peter W Fritsch, Ting Zhang and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 124 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
124citing papers in PubMed
91.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

124 citing papers in PubMed, 286 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Plastome evidence repositionsFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. The complete mitochondrial genome ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  11. The complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. PhytoKeys · 2026
    Article
  14. Comparative Plastome Analysis ofEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  15. Insights into phylogenetic relationships ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  16. The complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

64 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Hong-Tao Li *Germplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201, Yunnan, China.
Yang Luo *CAS Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201, Yunnan, China.
Lu Gan *Germplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201, Yunnan, China.
Peng-Fei Ma *Germplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201, Yunnan, China.
Lian-Ming Gao *Kunming College of Life Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201, Yunnan, China.
Jun-Bo Yang *Germplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201, Yunnan, China.
Jie Cai *Germplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201, Yunnan, China.
Matthew A GitzendannerFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Peter W FritschBotanical Research Institute of Texas, 1700 University Drive, Fort Worth, TX, 76017, USA.
Ting ZhangGermplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201, Yunnan, China.
Jian-Jun JinGermplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201, Yunnan, China.
Chun-Xia ZengGermplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201, Yunnan, China.
Hong WangKunming College of Life Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201, Yunnan, China.
Wen-Bin YuCenter for Integrative Conservation, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla, 666303, Yunnan, China.
Rong ZhangGermplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201, Yunnan, China.
Michelle van der BankDepartment of Botany & Plant Biotechnology, University of Johannesburg, PO Box 524, Auckland Park, Johannesburg, Gauteng, 2006, South Africa.
Richard G OlmsteadDepartment of Biology and Burke Museum, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195-5325, USA.
Peter M HollingsworthRoyal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH3 5LR, Scotland, UK.
Mark W ChaseRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3DS, England, UK.
Douglas E SoltisFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Pamela S SoltisFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Ting-Shuang YiGermplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201, Yunnan, China. tingshuangyi@mail.kib.ac.cn.
De-Zhu LiGermplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201, Yunnan, China. dzl@mail.kib.ac.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-4990-724X
Kunming Institute of Botany · CNFlorida Museum of Natural History · USBotanical Research Institute of Texas · USCurtin University · AURoyal Botanic Garden Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Johannesburg · ZAUniversity of Washington · USXishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFlowering plants (angiosperms) are dominant components of global terrestrial ecosystems, but phylogenetic relationships at the familial level and above remain only partially resolved, greatly impeding our full understanding of their evolution and early diversification. The plastome, typically mapped as a circular genome, has been the most important molecular data source for plant phylogeny reconstruction for decades.

resultsHere, we assembled by far the largest plastid dataset of angiosperms, composed of 80 genes from 4792 plastomes of 4660 species in 2024 genera representing all currently recognized families. Our phylogenetic tree (PPA II) is essentially congruent with those of previous plastid phylogenomic analyses but generally provides greater clade support. In the PPA II tree, 75% of nodes at or above the ordinal level and 78% at or above the familial level were resolved with high bootstrap support (BP ≥ 90). We obtained strong support for many interordinal and interfamilial relationships that were poorly resolved previously within the core eudicots, such as Dilleniales, Saxifragales, and Vitales being resolved as successive sisters to the remaining rosids, and Santalales, Berberidopsidales, and Caryophyllales as successive sisters to the asterids. However, the placement of magnoliids, although resolved as sister to all other Mesangiospermae, is not well supported and disagrees with topologies inferred from nuclear data. Relationships among the five major clades of Mesangiospermae remain intractable despite increased sampling, probably due to an ancient rapid radiation.

conclusionsWe provide the most comprehensive dataset of plastomes to date and a well-resolved phylogenetic tree, which together provide a strong foundation for future evolutionary studies of flowering plants.

Indexed as

MagnoliopsidaCell NucleusEcosystemHumansPhylogenyPlastidsInterfamilial relationshipsMesangiospermaePlastomePPA IITree of life

Identifiers

PMID34711223
PMCPMC8555322
OpenAlexW3209782606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.